Emotional Distraction in E-learning Environment: Effect on Declarative Memory and Exploration of Physiological Marker

Zulfikri Khakim, Sri Kusrohmaniah
{"title":"Emotional Distraction in E-learning Environment: Effect on Declarative Memory and Exploration of Physiological Marker","authors":"Zulfikri Khakim, Sri Kusrohmaniah","doi":"10.22146/jpsi.74145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the advantage of e-learning method is the flexibility of embedding audio-visual materials, however whether this goal-irrelevant stimuli would distract the users instead and hinder their performance is generally unknown. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of emotional distraction (ED) on the declarative memory performance. The study was conducted using the within-subject experiment on 38 students aged 18-21 years (20 males). Declarative memory was measured using a Word-Pair Association (WPA) task. ED is given using the International Affective Pictures System (IAPS) and International Affective Digitized Sounds (IADS) grouped based on their valence (neutral, positive, and negative). Measurement of physiological responses was done by measuring Galvanic Skin Responses (GSR), and Electroencephalography (EEG) with Frontal Alpha Asymmetry (FAA) index. Result: significant difference on the WPA score of which Positive is lower than Neutral condition (p = 0.011), but only on the group which the positive block were presented first. From the GSR data, significant main effect of the order of experimental block regardless of the ED valence (p < 0.001; F = 16.045), the first block elicits significantly higher GSR amplitude compared to second (p < 0.001; t = 4.94) and third (p = 0.001; t = 3.90). Meanwhile, the FAA index showed no significant difference (p = 0.654; F = 0.433).","PeriodicalId":55655,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Psikologi","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Psikologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.74145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the advantage of e-learning method is the flexibility of embedding audio-visual materials, however whether this goal-irrelevant stimuli would distract the users instead and hinder their performance is generally unknown. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of emotional distraction (ED) on the declarative memory performance. The study was conducted using the within-subject experiment on 38 students aged 18-21 years (20 males). Declarative memory was measured using a Word-Pair Association (WPA) task. ED is given using the International Affective Pictures System (IAPS) and International Affective Digitized Sounds (IADS) grouped based on their valence (neutral, positive, and negative). Measurement of physiological responses was done by measuring Galvanic Skin Responses (GSR), and Electroencephalography (EEG) with Frontal Alpha Asymmetry (FAA) index. Result: significant difference on the WPA score of which Positive is lower than Neutral condition (p = 0.011), but only on the group which the positive block were presented first. From the GSR data, significant main effect of the order of experimental block regardless of the ED valence (p < 0.001; F = 16.045), the first block elicits significantly higher GSR amplitude compared to second (p < 0.001; t = 4.94) and third (p = 0.001; t = 3.90). Meanwhile, the FAA index showed no significant difference (p = 0.654; F = 0.433).
网络学习环境下情绪分心对陈述性记忆的影响及生理标记的探索
电子学习方法的优点之一是嵌入视听材料的灵活性,但是这种与目标无关的刺激是否会分散用户的注意力并阻碍他们的表现通常是未知的。本研究旨在探讨情绪分心对陈述性记忆表现的影响。本研究采用主体内实验的方法对38名年龄在18-21岁的大学生(其中20名男性)进行研究。陈述性记忆是用单词对关联(WPA)任务来测量的。ED是使用国际情感图片系统(IAPS)和国际情感数字化声音(IADS)根据它们的效价(中性、正、负)分组给出的。通过测量皮肤电反应(GSR)和脑电图(EEG)的额叶α不对称指数(FAA)来测量生理反应。结果:阳性组的WPA评分低于中性组,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.011),但仅在阳性块先出现组有统计学意义。从GSR数据来看,无论ED效价如何,实验块的顺序都有显著的主效应(p < 0.001;F = 16.045),第一块诱发的GSR振幅显著高于第二块(p < 0.001;T = 4.94)和第三(p = 0.001;T = 3.90)。同时,FAA指数差异无统计学意义(p = 0.654;F = 0.433)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信