The Effect of Early Electric Vehicle Subsidies on the Automobile Market

IF 5.1 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Xi Wu, Jing Gong, Brad N. Greenwood, Yiping Song
{"title":"The Effect of Early Electric Vehicle Subsidies on the Automobile Market","authors":"Xi Wu, Jing Gong, Brad N. Greenwood, Yiping Song","doi":"10.1177/07439156221134927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subsidies have become increasingly popular for policy makers to promote the adoption of ecofriendly new technologies. Normally, the costs of these subsidies are nontrivial, underscoring the need to determine their efficacy. This work examines one subsidy used to steer consumers away from outmoded technologies and accelerate the adoption of green technologies: purchase subsidies for electric vehicles (EVs). On the one hand, such subsidies might cannibalize the market for traditional vehicles. On the other hand, such subsidies may result in overall market expansion, with little effect on traditional vehicle purchasing. Leveraging a phased subsidy rollout aimed at the early-stage EV market in China and a difference-in-differences approach, the authors find that subsidies strongly encourage EV purchasing but have little effect on traditional vehicle purchasing. This suggests that market expansion may result from the subsidy during the EV emergence and undermines the expected cannibalization on the traditional market. Further, the expansion effect is larger in cities with more severe air pollution. Finally, results reveal some level of cannibalization in cities of higher income and educational attainment. This suggests that although subsidies have yet to yield the intended cannibalization for the market overall, it is beginning to manifest in some parts of the market.","PeriodicalId":51437,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing","volume":"75 1","pages":"169 - 186"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156221134927","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Subsidies have become increasingly popular for policy makers to promote the adoption of ecofriendly new technologies. Normally, the costs of these subsidies are nontrivial, underscoring the need to determine their efficacy. This work examines one subsidy used to steer consumers away from outmoded technologies and accelerate the adoption of green technologies: purchase subsidies for electric vehicles (EVs). On the one hand, such subsidies might cannibalize the market for traditional vehicles. On the other hand, such subsidies may result in overall market expansion, with little effect on traditional vehicle purchasing. Leveraging a phased subsidy rollout aimed at the early-stage EV market in China and a difference-in-differences approach, the authors find that subsidies strongly encourage EV purchasing but have little effect on traditional vehicle purchasing. This suggests that market expansion may result from the subsidy during the EV emergence and undermines the expected cannibalization on the traditional market. Further, the expansion effect is larger in cities with more severe air pollution. Finally, results reveal some level of cannibalization in cities of higher income and educational attainment. This suggests that although subsidies have yet to yield the intended cannibalization for the market overall, it is beginning to manifest in some parts of the market.
早期电动汽车补贴对汽车市场的影响
政策制定者为促进采用环保新技术而提供的补贴越来越受欢迎。通常情况下,这些补贴的成本不是微不足道的,因此需要确定其有效性。这项工作考察了一种用于引导消费者远离过时技术并加速采用绿色技术的补贴:电动汽车(ev)的购买补贴。一方面,这种补贴可能会蚕食传统汽车的市场。另一方面,这类补贴可能导致整体市场扩张,对传统购车影响不大。利用针对中国早期电动汽车市场的分阶段补贴和差异中的差异方法,作者发现补贴有力地鼓励了电动汽车的购买,但对传统汽车的购买影响甚微。这表明,电动汽车出现期间的补贴可能会导致市场扩张,并破坏传统市场的预期蚕食。此外,在空气污染严重的城市,扩张效应更大。最后,研究结果显示,在收入和受教育程度较高的城市,存在一定程度的同类相食现象。这表明,尽管补贴尚未对整个市场产生预期的蚕食,但它已开始在市场的某些部分显现出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Policy & Marketing welcomes manuscripts from diverse disciplines to offer a range of perspectives. We encourage submissions from individuals with varied backgrounds, such as marketing, communications, economics, consumer affairs, law, public policy, sociology, psychology, anthropology, or philosophy. The journal prioritizes well-documented, well-reasoned, balanced, and relevant manuscripts, regardless of the author's field of expertise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信