Designing value propositions: An exploration and extension of Sinek’s ‘Golden Circle’ model

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Karla Straker, Erez Nusem
{"title":"Designing value propositions: An exploration and extension of Sinek’s ‘Golden Circle’ model","authors":"Karla Straker, Erez Nusem","doi":"10.1386/DBS.5.1.59_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizations feel compelled to tell us ‘what’ they do, without first explaining ‘why’ they do it. Part of the design process is first understanding the need (the why) before focusing on the outcome (the what). An organization’s ‘why’, if successful, can inspire employees and customers to buy-in long term, by resonating on a deeper, emotional level. Sinek’s ‘Golden Circle’ concept has been used to analyse 100 organization’s value propositions across sixteen industries to understand how they are currently communicating their what, how and why. Findings revealed that only 24 per cent of organizations expressed their ‘why’ explicitly compared to the how and what results. This article provides organizations with the tools to better understand their value through an iterative design process, providing an opportunity for organizations to develop their ‘why’ from the inside out. This article explains why the analysis of an organization’s value proposition should be the focus of what should be driving strategy decisions and communicated throughout the organization.","PeriodicalId":36715,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Design, Business and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Design, Business and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/DBS.5.1.59_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Organizations feel compelled to tell us ‘what’ they do, without first explaining ‘why’ they do it. Part of the design process is first understanding the need (the why) before focusing on the outcome (the what). An organization’s ‘why’, if successful, can inspire employees and customers to buy-in long term, by resonating on a deeper, emotional level. Sinek’s ‘Golden Circle’ concept has been used to analyse 100 organization’s value propositions across sixteen industries to understand how they are currently communicating their what, how and why. Findings revealed that only 24 per cent of organizations expressed their ‘why’ explicitly compared to the how and what results. This article provides organizations with the tools to better understand their value through an iterative design process, providing an opportunity for organizations to develop their ‘why’ from the inside out. This article explains why the analysis of an organization’s value proposition should be the focus of what should be driving strategy decisions and communicated throughout the organization.
设计价值主张:对斯涅克“黄金圈”模型的探索与延伸
组织觉得有必要告诉我们他们“做什么”,而不是首先解释他们“为什么”这样做。设计过程的一部分是首先理解需求(为什么),然后再关注结果(什么)。一个组织的“为什么”,如果成功的话,可以激发员工和客户在更深层次的情感层面上的共鸣,从而长期购买。斯涅克的“黄金圈”概念已被用于分析16个行业的100家组织的价值主张,以了解他们目前如何传达他们的“是什么”、“如何”和“为什么”。调查结果显示,只有24%的组织明确表达了“为什么”,而不是“如何”和“结果”。本文为组织提供了通过迭代设计过程更好地理解其价值的工具,为组织提供了从内到外开发“为什么”的机会。本文解释了为什么对组织价值主张的分析应该是驱动战略决策和在整个组织中进行沟通的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Design, Business and Society
Journal of Design, Business and Society Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信