Digital Representation of Measurement Uncertainty: A Case Study Linking an RMO Key Comparison with a CIPM Key Comparison

B. D. Hall, A. Koo
{"title":"Digital Representation of Measurement Uncertainty: A Case Study Linking an RMO Key Comparison with a CIPM Key Comparison","authors":"B. D. Hall, A. Koo","doi":"10.3390/metrology1020011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers a future scenario in which digital reporting of measurement results is ubiquitous and digital calibration certificates (DCCs) contain information about the components of uncertainty in a measurement result. The task of linking international measurement comparisons is used as a case study to look at the benefits of digitalization. Comparison linking provides a context in which correlations are important, so the benefit of passing a digital record of contributions to uncertainty along a traceability chain can be examined. The International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) uses a program of international “key comparisons” to establish the extent to which measurements of a particular quantity may be considered equivalent when made in different economies. To obtain good international coverage, the results of the comparisons may be linked together: a number of regional metrology organization (RMO) key comparisons can be linked back to an initial CIPM key comparison. Specific information about systematic effects in participants’ results must be available during linking to allow correct treatment of the correlations. However, the conventional calibration certificate formats used today do not provide this: participants must submit additional data, and the report of an initial comparison must anticipate the requirements for future linking. Special handling of additional data can be laborious and prone to error. An uncertain-number digital reporting format was considered in this case study, which caters to all the information required and would simplify the comparison analysis, reporting, and linking; the format would also enable a more informative presentation of comparison results. The uncertain-number format would be useful more generally, in measurement scenarios where correlations arise, so its incorporation into DCCs should be considered. A full dataset supported by open-source software is available.","PeriodicalId":100666,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Metrology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Metrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology1020011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper considers a future scenario in which digital reporting of measurement results is ubiquitous and digital calibration certificates (DCCs) contain information about the components of uncertainty in a measurement result. The task of linking international measurement comparisons is used as a case study to look at the benefits of digitalization. Comparison linking provides a context in which correlations are important, so the benefit of passing a digital record of contributions to uncertainty along a traceability chain can be examined. The International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) uses a program of international “key comparisons” to establish the extent to which measurements of a particular quantity may be considered equivalent when made in different economies. To obtain good international coverage, the results of the comparisons may be linked together: a number of regional metrology organization (RMO) key comparisons can be linked back to an initial CIPM key comparison. Specific information about systematic effects in participants’ results must be available during linking to allow correct treatment of the correlations. However, the conventional calibration certificate formats used today do not provide this: participants must submit additional data, and the report of an initial comparison must anticipate the requirements for future linking. Special handling of additional data can be laborious and prone to error. An uncertain-number digital reporting format was considered in this case study, which caters to all the information required and would simplify the comparison analysis, reporting, and linking; the format would also enable a more informative presentation of comparison results. The uncertain-number format would be useful more generally, in measurement scenarios where correlations arise, so its incorporation into DCCs should be considered. A full dataset supported by open-source software is available.
测量不确定度的数字表示:连接RMO键比较与CIPM键比较的案例研究
本文考虑了一种未来的场景,在这种场景中,测量结果的数字报告无处不在,数字校准证书(dcc)包含有关测量结果不确定度组成部分的信息。将国际测量比较联系起来的任务被用作案例研究,以了解数字化的好处。比较链接提供了一个相关性很重要的环境,因此可以检查沿着可追溯链传递对不确定性贡献的数字记录的好处。国际度量衡委员会(CIPM)使用一种国际“关键比较”程序来确定在不同经济体中测量某一特定数量时可被视为等同的程度。为了获得良好的国际覆盖,比较的结果可以联系在一起:一些区域计量组织(RMO)的关键比较可以与最初的CIPM关键比较联系起来。在链接过程中,必须提供有关参与者结果中系统效应的具体信息,以便正确处理相关性。然而,目前使用的传统校准证书格式不提供这一点:参与者必须提交额外的数据,初始比较报告必须预测未来链接的要求。对附加数据的特殊处理可能很费力,而且容易出错。在本案例研究中考虑了一种不确定数字的数字报告格式,它满足所有所需的信息,并将简化比较分析、报告和链接;这种格式也将使比较结果的介绍更加翔实。在出现相关性的测量场景中,不确定数格式将更普遍地有用,因此应考虑将其合并到dcs中。完整的数据集由开源软件支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信