Clinical, genetic and neuropathological findings in a series of 138 fetuses with a corpus callosum malformation.

Q Medicine
C. Alby, V. Malan, Lucile Boutaud, M. Marangoni, B. Bessières, M. Bonnière, A. Ichkou, Nadia Elkhartoufi, N. Bahi-Buisson, P. Sonigo, A. Millischer, Sophie Thomas, Y. Ville, M. Vekemans, F. Encha-Razavi, T. Attié-Bitach
{"title":"Clinical, genetic and neuropathological findings in a series of 138 fetuses with a corpus callosum malformation.","authors":"C. Alby, V. Malan, Lucile Boutaud, M. Marangoni, B. Bessières, M. Bonnière, A. Ichkou, Nadia Elkhartoufi, N. Bahi-Buisson, P. Sonigo, A. Millischer, Sophie Thomas, Y. Ville, M. Vekemans, F. Encha-Razavi, T. Attié-Bitach","doi":"10.1002/bdra.23472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Corpus callosum malformation (CCM) is the most frequent brain malformation observed at birth. Because CCM is a highly heterogeneous condition, the prognosis of fetuses diagnosed prenatally remains uncertain, making prenatal counseling difficult. METHODS AND RESULTS We evaluated retrospectively a total of 138 fetuses, 117 with CCM observed on prenatal imaging examination, and 21 after postmortem autopsy. On ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging, CCM was either isolated (N = 40) or associated with other neurological (N = 57) or extra cerebral findings (N = 21/20, respectively). RESULTS Most fetuses (N = 132) remained without a diagnosis at the time of pregnancy termination. This emphasizes the need to establish a neuropathological classification and to perform a genomic screening using comparative genomic hybridization. A neuropathological examination performed on 138 cases revealed a spectrum of CCMs, classified as follows: agenesis of corpus callosum (55), CC hypoplasia (30), CC dysmorphism (24), and CCM associated with a malformation of cortical development (29). Of interest, after fetopathological examination, only 16/40 malformations were classified as isolated, highlighting the importance of the autopsy following termination of pregnancy. Among the 138 cases, the underlying etiology was found in 46 cases: diabetes (one case), cytomegalovirus infection (one case), 23 chromosome abnormalities, and 21 mendelian conditions. CONCLUSION In our series of 138 cases of CCM, prenatal and postmortem examinations identified a variety of genetic causes. However, no diagnosis could be established in 67% of cases. The classification based on the underlying neurodevelopmental defects paves the way for further genetic studies and genotype-phenotype correlations.","PeriodicalId":8983,"journal":{"name":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","volume":"1 1","pages":"36-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.23472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

BACKGROUND Corpus callosum malformation (CCM) is the most frequent brain malformation observed at birth. Because CCM is a highly heterogeneous condition, the prognosis of fetuses diagnosed prenatally remains uncertain, making prenatal counseling difficult. METHODS AND RESULTS We evaluated retrospectively a total of 138 fetuses, 117 with CCM observed on prenatal imaging examination, and 21 after postmortem autopsy. On ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging, CCM was either isolated (N = 40) or associated with other neurological (N = 57) or extra cerebral findings (N = 21/20, respectively). RESULTS Most fetuses (N = 132) remained without a diagnosis at the time of pregnancy termination. This emphasizes the need to establish a neuropathological classification and to perform a genomic screening using comparative genomic hybridization. A neuropathological examination performed on 138 cases revealed a spectrum of CCMs, classified as follows: agenesis of corpus callosum (55), CC hypoplasia (30), CC dysmorphism (24), and CCM associated with a malformation of cortical development (29). Of interest, after fetopathological examination, only 16/40 malformations were classified as isolated, highlighting the importance of the autopsy following termination of pregnancy. Among the 138 cases, the underlying etiology was found in 46 cases: diabetes (one case), cytomegalovirus infection (one case), 23 chromosome abnormalities, and 21 mendelian conditions. CONCLUSION In our series of 138 cases of CCM, prenatal and postmortem examinations identified a variety of genetic causes. However, no diagnosis could be established in 67% of cases. The classification based on the underlying neurodevelopmental defects paves the way for further genetic studies and genotype-phenotype correlations.
138例胼胝体畸形胎儿的临床、遗传和神经病理学分析。
背景胼胝体畸形(CCM)是出生时最常见的脑畸形。由于CCM是一种高度异质性的疾病,产前诊断的胎儿预后仍然不确定,这使得产前咨询变得困难。方法和结果我们回顾性评估了138例胎儿,其中117例在产前影像学检查中发现CCM, 21例在尸检后发现CCM。在超声和/或磁共振成像中,CCM要么是孤立的(N = 40),要么与其他神经学(N = 57)或脑外发现(N = 21/20)相关。结果大多数胎儿(N = 132)在终止妊娠时仍未确诊。这强调需要建立一个神经病理分类和执行基因组筛选使用比较基因组杂交。138例CCM的神经病理学检查显示了一系列CCM,分类如下:胼胝体发育不全(55例)、CC发育不全(30例)、CC畸形(24例)和伴有皮质发育畸形的CCM(29例)。有趣的是,在胎儿病理学检查后,只有16/40的畸形被分类为孤立的,突出了终止妊娠后尸检的重要性。138例中,潜在病因46例:糖尿病(1例)、巨细胞病毒感染(1例)、染色体异常23例、孟德尔综合征21例。结论在我们的138例CCM中,产前和尸检检查发现了多种遗传原因。然而,67%的病例无法确诊。基于潜在神经发育缺陷的分类为进一步的遗传研究和基因型-表型相关性铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology 医药科学, 胎儿发育与产前诊断, 生殖系统/围生医学/新生儿
CiteScore
1.86
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信