Consensus on the detection and management of patients with depression and pain as an associated somatic symptom

0 PSYCHIATRY
Víctor Pérez-Solá , José M. Montes , Eva Trillo-Calvo , Vicente Gasull , Javier García-Campayo , Jose Manuel Olivares-Diez , Esther Berrocoso , Juan Antonio Mico , Luis Agüera-Ortiz
{"title":"Consensus on the detection and management of patients with depression and pain as an associated somatic symptom","authors":"Víctor Pérez-Solá ,&nbsp;José M. Montes ,&nbsp;Eva Trillo-Calvo ,&nbsp;Vicente Gasull ,&nbsp;Javier García-Campayo ,&nbsp;Jose Manuel Olivares-Diez ,&nbsp;Esther Berrocoso ,&nbsp;Juan Antonio Mico ,&nbsp;Luis Agüera-Ortiz","doi":"10.1016/j.sjpmh.2023.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Globally, depression is the most common psychiatric disorder and is frequently associated with somatic symptom disorders, including pain as a physical symptom. There is a current need to improve the detection and management of the individuals in which depression and pain coexist. Hence, the aim of this document is to provide recommendations in the diagnosis and management of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who have pain as a physical symptom (PPS), in order to reduce the variability of clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>The methodology used is based on the internationally recognized RAND/UCLA consensus method. The scientific committee, consisted of a group of eight multidisciplinary experts, defined 12 clinically relevant questions. After the systematic review of the literature, the scientific committee assessed the evidence and developed recommendations. The panel group with 15 participants validated these recommendations using a single Delphi round. To conclude, there was a final consensus meeting held to redefine with minor modifications the final recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The scientific committee developed a total of 19 recommendations on the diagnosis and detection, impact of PPS in MDD, treatment of MDD with associated PPS, use of healthcare resources, additional recommendations, and care coordination of these patients. Globally, a substantial level of agreement (≥80%) was reached on all items during the Delphi round. All the 19 achieved consensus, seven of them (37%) were agreed with unanimity during the Delphi round. The recommendations with higher consensus were in relation to diagnosis, impact of PPS in MDD, treatment and use of healthcare resources.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Currently, the evidence base for patients with MDD and PPS is still being developed and this consensus statement aims to bridge that gap by providing practical recommendations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101179,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","volume":"18 1","pages":"Pages 21-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950285323000558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Globally, depression is the most common psychiatric disorder and is frequently associated with somatic symptom disorders, including pain as a physical symptom. There is a current need to improve the detection and management of the individuals in which depression and pain coexist. Hence, the aim of this document is to provide recommendations in the diagnosis and management of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who have pain as a physical symptom (PPS), in order to reduce the variability of clinical practice.

Material and methods

The methodology used is based on the internationally recognized RAND/UCLA consensus method. The scientific committee, consisted of a group of eight multidisciplinary experts, defined 12 clinically relevant questions. After the systematic review of the literature, the scientific committee assessed the evidence and developed recommendations. The panel group with 15 participants validated these recommendations using a single Delphi round. To conclude, there was a final consensus meeting held to redefine with minor modifications the final recommendations.

Results

The scientific committee developed a total of 19 recommendations on the diagnosis and detection, impact of PPS in MDD, treatment of MDD with associated PPS, use of healthcare resources, additional recommendations, and care coordination of these patients. Globally, a substantial level of agreement (≥80%) was reached on all items during the Delphi round. All the 19 achieved consensus, seven of them (37%) were agreed with unanimity during the Delphi round. The recommendations with higher consensus were in relation to diagnosis, impact of PPS in MDD, treatment and use of healthcare resources.

Conclusions

Currently, the evidence base for patients with MDD and PPS is still being developed and this consensus statement aims to bridge that gap by providing practical recommendations.
关于抑郁和疼痛作为相关躯体症状的患者的检测和管理的共识。
在全球范围内,抑郁症是最常见的精神疾病,并且经常与躯体症状障碍相关,包括作为身体症状的疼痛。目前需要改进对抑郁和疼痛并存的个体的检测和管理。因此,本文的目的是为重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的诊断和管理提供建议,以减少临床实践的可变性。材料和方法:使用的方法基于国际公认的兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校共识方法。该科学委员会由8名多学科专家组成,确定了12个临床相关问题。在对文献进行系统回顾后,科学委员会评估了证据并提出了建议。由15名参与者组成的小组小组使用单一德尔菲回合验证了这些建议。最后,举行了最后协商一致意见会议,对最后的建议作了微小的修改。结果:科学委员会在诊断和检测、PPS对重度抑郁症的影响、与PPS相关的重度抑郁症的治疗、医疗资源的使用、附加建议和这些患者的护理协调方面共提出了19项建议。在全球范围内,德尔菲回合在所有项目上达成了相当程度的一致(≥80%)。19个国家均取得一致意见,其中7个国家(37%)在德尔菲回合中获得一致意见。在诊断、PPS对重度抑郁症的影响、治疗和医疗资源利用等方面,建议的一致性较高。结论:目前,重度抑郁症和PPS患者的证据基础仍在开发中,本共识声明旨在通过提供实用建议来弥合这一差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信