Use of Ultrasound-Guided Tendon Fenestration and Injection Procedures for Treatment of Tendinosis.

Kansas journal of medicine Pub Date : 2023-10-30 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17161/kjm.vol16.18511
Garrett Koehn, Lexi Jackson, Elizabeth Ablah, Hayrettin Okut, Andrew Porter
{"title":"Use of Ultrasound-Guided Tendon Fenestration and Injection Procedures for Treatment of Tendinosis.","authors":"Garrett Koehn, Lexi Jackson, Elizabeth Ablah, Hayrettin Okut, Andrew Porter","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol16.18511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Overuse injuries such as tendinosis are a common complaint at sports medicine clinics. When conservative management for tendinosis has failed, ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration and injection procedures, such as dry needling, needling tenotomy, autologous whole blood injections, and prolotherapy, can be utilized for treatment. This study examined the effectiveness of these procedures for pain improvement and ability to return to activity for patients with tendinosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved a chart review of patients 15 years or older who underwent at least one treatment for tendinosis at a sports medicine clinic between January 1, 2014 and April 17, 2019. Eligible patients had at least one of the following procedures: 1) percutaneous dry needling, 2) percutaneous needle tenotomy, 3) autologous whole blood injection, and/or 4) prolotherapy. A Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code query was used to screen patient charts for study inclusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 680 patients' data were reviewed, and 343 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients underwent a total of 598 unique procedures. Dry needling represented most procedures (62.8%, n = 375). Most patients reported diminished pain at follow up (73.0%, n = 268). Prolotherapy had the highest percentage among the follow up patients reporting diminished pain (81.0%, n = 17). Most patients were able to return to activity at follow-up (47.4%, n = 172). A greater proportion of patients with autologous whole blood injection were able to return to activity (60.7%, n = 85).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients with tendinosis who underwent tendon fenestration or injection procedures reported diminished pain at follow-up. Autologous whole blood injection may be more likely to diminish patient pain and allow return to activity than other procedure types. More research is needed across all anatomical sites to compare the generalized effectiveness of these procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94121,"journal":{"name":"Kansas journal of medicine","volume":"16 ","pages":"258-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635684/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol16.18511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Overuse injuries such as tendinosis are a common complaint at sports medicine clinics. When conservative management for tendinosis has failed, ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration and injection procedures, such as dry needling, needling tenotomy, autologous whole blood injections, and prolotherapy, can be utilized for treatment. This study examined the effectiveness of these procedures for pain improvement and ability to return to activity for patients with tendinosis.

Methods: This study involved a chart review of patients 15 years or older who underwent at least one treatment for tendinosis at a sports medicine clinic between January 1, 2014 and April 17, 2019. Eligible patients had at least one of the following procedures: 1) percutaneous dry needling, 2) percutaneous needle tenotomy, 3) autologous whole blood injection, and/or 4) prolotherapy. A Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code query was used to screen patient charts for study inclusion.

Results: In total, 680 patients' data were reviewed, and 343 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients underwent a total of 598 unique procedures. Dry needling represented most procedures (62.8%, n = 375). Most patients reported diminished pain at follow up (73.0%, n = 268). Prolotherapy had the highest percentage among the follow up patients reporting diminished pain (81.0%, n = 17). Most patients were able to return to activity at follow-up (47.4%, n = 172). A greater proportion of patients with autologous whole blood injection were able to return to activity (60.7%, n = 85).

Conclusions: Most patients with tendinosis who underwent tendon fenestration or injection procedures reported diminished pain at follow-up. Autologous whole blood injection may be more likely to diminish patient pain and allow return to activity than other procedure types. More research is needed across all anatomical sites to compare the generalized effectiveness of these procedures.

超声引导下肌腱开窗和注射治疗肌腱病的应用。
简介:过度使用损伤,如肌腱病是一个常见的投诉在运动医学诊所。当保守治疗腱鞘病失败时,可采用超声引导下的肌腱开窗注射手术,如干针、针刺肌腱切断术、自体全血注射、前驱治疗等。本研究检查了这些手术对肌腱病患者疼痛改善和恢复活动能力的有效性。方法:本研究纳入了2014年1月1日至2019年4月17日期间在运动医学诊所接受至少一种肌腱病治疗的15岁或以上患者的图表回顾。符合条件的患者至少进行了以下一项手术:1)经皮干针,2)经皮针刺肌腱切开术,3)自体全血注射,和/或4)前驱治疗。当前程序术语(CPT)代码查询用于筛选纳入研究的患者图表。结果:共纳入680例患者资料,343例患者符合纳入标准。患者总共接受了598次独特的手术。干针是大多数手术(62.8%,n = 375)。大多数患者在随访时报告疼痛减轻(73.0%,n = 268)。前瞻治疗在随访患者中报告疼痛减轻的比例最高(81.0%,n = 17)。大多数患者在随访时能够恢复活动(47.4%,n = 172)。接受自体全血注射的患者能够恢复活动的比例更高(60.7%,n = 85)。结论:大多数接受肌腱开窗或注射手术的腱鞘病患者在随访时报告疼痛减轻。自体全血注射可能比其他手术类型更有可能减轻患者疼痛并使其恢复活动。需要在所有解剖部位进行更多的研究来比较这些手术的普遍有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信