The indispensable whole of work and population health: How the working life exposome can advance empirical research, policy, and action.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yorghos Apostolopoulos, Sevil Sönmez, Matthew S Thiese, Lazaros K Gallos
{"title":"The indispensable <i>whole</i> of work and population health: How the working life exposome can advance empirical research, policy, and action.","authors":"Yorghos Apostolopoulos, Sevil Sönmez, Matthew S Thiese, Lazaros K Gallos","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The thesis of this paper is that health and safety challenges of working people can only be fully understood by examining them as wholes with interacting parts. This paper unravels this indispensable whole by introducing the working life exposome and elucidating how associated epistemologies and methodologies can enhance empirical research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Network and population health scientists have initiated an ongoing discourse on the state of empirical work-health-safety-well-being research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Empirical research has not fully captured the totality and complexity of multiple and interacting work and nonwork factors defining the health of working people over their life course. We challenge the prevailing paradigm by proposing to expand it from narrow work-related exposures and associated monocausal frameworks to the holistic study of work and population health grounded in complexity and exposome sciences. Health challenges of working people are determined by, embedded in, and/or operate as complex systems comprised of multilayered and interdependent components. One can identify many potentially causal factors as sufficient and component causes where removal of one or more of these can impact disease progression. We, therefore, cannot effectively study them by an a priori determination of a set of components and/or properties to be examined separately and then recombine partial approaches, attempting to form a picture of the whole. Instead, we must examine these challenges as wholes from the start, with an emphasis on interactions among their multifactorial components and their emergent properties. Despite various challenges, working-life-exposome-grounded frameworks and associated innovations have the potential to accomplish that.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This emerging paradigm shift can move empirical work-health-safety-well-being research to cutting-edge science and enable more impactful policies and actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"83-95"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10927210/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4130","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The thesis of this paper is that health and safety challenges of working people can only be fully understood by examining them as wholes with interacting parts. This paper unravels this indispensable whole by introducing the working life exposome and elucidating how associated epistemologies and methodologies can enhance empirical research.

Methods: Network and population health scientists have initiated an ongoing discourse on the state of empirical work-health-safety-well-being research.

Results: Empirical research has not fully captured the totality and complexity of multiple and interacting work and nonwork factors defining the health of working people over their life course. We challenge the prevailing paradigm by proposing to expand it from narrow work-related exposures and associated monocausal frameworks to the holistic study of work and population health grounded in complexity and exposome sciences. Health challenges of working people are determined by, embedded in, and/or operate as complex systems comprised of multilayered and interdependent components. One can identify many potentially causal factors as sufficient and component causes where removal of one or more of these can impact disease progression. We, therefore, cannot effectively study them by an a priori determination of a set of components and/or properties to be examined separately and then recombine partial approaches, attempting to form a picture of the whole. Instead, we must examine these challenges as wholes from the start, with an emphasis on interactions among their multifactorial components and their emergent properties. Despite various challenges, working-life-exposome-grounded frameworks and associated innovations have the potential to accomplish that.

Conclusions: This emerging paradigm shift can move empirical work-health-safety-well-being research to cutting-edge science and enable more impactful policies and actions.

工作与人口健康不可或缺的整体:工作生活暴露如何推动实证研究、政策和行动。
目的:本文的论点是,劳动人民的健康和安全挑战只能通过检查他们作为一个整体与相互作用的部分来充分理解。本文通过介绍工作生活的曝光和阐明相关的认识论和方法如何加强实证研究来揭示这一不可或缺的整体。方法:网络和人口健康科学家已经发起了一个正在进行的论述的经验工作-健康-安全-福祉研究的状态。结果:实证研究尚未完全捕捉到决定劳动者一生健康的多重和相互作用的工作和非工作因素的全面性和复杂性。我们通过提议将其从狭隘的与工作有关的暴露和相关的单原因框架扩展到基于复杂性和暴露科学的工作和人口健康的整体研究来挑战主流范式。劳动人民的健康挑战是由多层和相互依赖的组成部分组成的复杂系统决定、嵌入和/或运作的。人们可以确定许多潜在的因果因素作为充分和组成原因,其中一个或多个因素的去除可以影响疾病进展。因此,我们不能通过先验地确定一组单独检查的成分和/或属性,然后重新组合部分方法,试图形成整体的图像来有效地研究它们。相反,我们必须从一开始就把这些挑战作为一个整体来审视,重点是它们的多因素组成部分之间的相互作用及其涌现性。尽管面临各种挑战,但以工作生活为基础的框架和相关创新有可能实现这一目标。结论:这种新兴的范式转变可以将工作-健康-安全-福祉实证研究推向前沿科学,并实现更具影响力的政策和行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
9.50%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal is to promote research in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety and to increase knowledge through the publication of original research articles, systematic reviews, and other information of high interest. Areas of interest include occupational and environmental epidemiology, occupational and environmental medicine, psychosocial factors at work, physical work load, physical activity work-related mental and musculoskeletal problems, aging, work ability and return to work, working hours and health, occupational hygiene and toxicology, work safety and injury epidemiology as well as occupational health services. In addition to observational studies, quasi-experimental and intervention studies are welcome as well as methodological papers, occupational cohort profiles, and studies associated with economic evaluation. The Journal also publishes short communications, case reports, commentaries, discussion papers, clinical questions, consensus reports, meeting reports, other reports, book reviews, news, and announcements (jobs, courses, events etc).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信