Impact of Care-Recipient Relationship Type on Quality of Life in Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Dementia Over Time.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Aiping Lai, Lauren E Griffith, Ayse Kuspinar, Jenna-Smith Turchyn, Julie Richardson
{"title":"Impact of Care-Recipient Relationship Type on Quality of Life in Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Dementia Over Time.","authors":"Aiping Lai, Lauren E Griffith, Ayse Kuspinar, Jenna-Smith Turchyn, Julie Richardson","doi":"10.1177/08919887231215044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Maintaining quality of life (QoL) has been identified as the primary goal of care services for person living with dementia (PLWD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary analysis was conducted on five rounds of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) over 4 years. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to examine the prediction of relationship type on older adults' QoL through four domains: mental health, general health, functional limitations, and pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>older adults cared for by an adult-child or multiple caregivers predicted increased risk for functional limitations after adjustment for their socio-demographic and dementia status (IRR = 1.53, CI [1.26, 1.86]; IRR = 1.36, CI [1.14, 1.61], respectively). The interaction between the relationship type and education was significant. Older adults with a high school education or below, who were cared for by an adult child, had a significantly higher risk of increasing functional limitations over 4 years compared to those cared for by a spouse/partner (contrast = .50, <i>P</i> = .01, 95% CI [.07, .93]; contrast=.52, <i>P</i> = .03, 95% CI [.03, 1.02]; respectively). Similarly, older adults with a high school education, who were cared for by multiple caregivers, also experienced a significantly higher risk of increasing functional limitations than those cared for by a spouse/partner (contrast = .44, <i>P</i> = .03, 95% CI [.02, .85]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings provide evidence of the significant contribution of relationship type on PLWD's QoL changes over time. They also help to prioritize resource allocation while addressing PLWD's demands by socio-demographics such as education level.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"294-306"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11089829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887231215044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Maintaining quality of life (QoL) has been identified as the primary goal of care services for person living with dementia (PLWD).

Methods: A secondary analysis was conducted on five rounds of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) over 4 years. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to examine the prediction of relationship type on older adults' QoL through four domains: mental health, general health, functional limitations, and pain.

Results: older adults cared for by an adult-child or multiple caregivers predicted increased risk for functional limitations after adjustment for their socio-demographic and dementia status (IRR = 1.53, CI [1.26, 1.86]; IRR = 1.36, CI [1.14, 1.61], respectively). The interaction between the relationship type and education was significant. Older adults with a high school education or below, who were cared for by an adult child, had a significantly higher risk of increasing functional limitations over 4 years compared to those cared for by a spouse/partner (contrast = .50, P = .01, 95% CI [.07, .93]; contrast=.52, P = .03, 95% CI [.03, 1.02]; respectively). Similarly, older adults with a high school education, who were cared for by multiple caregivers, also experienced a significantly higher risk of increasing functional limitations than those cared for by a spouse/partner (contrast = .44, P = .03, 95% CI [.02, .85]).

Conclusion: Our findings provide evidence of the significant contribution of relationship type on PLWD's QoL changes over time. They also help to prioritize resource allocation while addressing PLWD's demands by socio-demographics such as education level.

照顾接受者关系类型对社区居住老年痴呆患者生活质量的影响。
导论:维持生活质量(QoL)已被确定为痴呆症患者(PLWD)护理服务的首要目标。方法:对全国健康与老龄化趋势研究(NHATS) 4年来的5轮资料进行二次分析。采用广义估计方程(GEE),通过心理健康、一般健康、功能限制和疼痛四个领域考察关系类型对老年人生活质量的预测。结果:经调整其社会人口统计学和痴呆状态后,由成人-儿童或多名照顾者照顾的老年人预测功能限制的风险增加(IRR = 1.53, CI [1.26, 1.86];IRR = 1.36, CI[1.14, 1.61])。关系类型与受教育程度的交互作用显著。受教育程度为高中或以下的老年人,由成年子女照顾,与由配偶/伴侣照顾的老年人相比,在4年内功能限制增加的风险明显更高(对比= 0.50,P = 0.01, 95% CI[。]07年,公布);对比=。52, p = .03, 95% ci[。03年,1.02);分别)。同样,由多名照顾者照顾的受过高中教育的老年人,其功能限制增加的风险也明显高于由配偶/伴侣照顾的老年人(对比= 0.44,P = 0.03, 95% CI)。02年,.85])。结论:我们的研究结果提供了关系类型对PLWD生活质量随时间变化的显著贡献的证据。它们还有助于优先分配资源,同时满足PLWD的社会人口需求,如教育水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (JGP) brings together original research, clinical reviews, and timely case reports on neuropsychiatric care of aging patients, including age-related biologic, neurologic, and psychiatric illnesses; psychosocial problems; forensic issues; and family care. The journal offers the latest peer-reviewed information on cognitive, mood, anxiety, addictive, and sleep disorders in older patients, as well as tested diagnostic tools and therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信