Mateo López-Moral, Marta García-Madrid, Raúl J Molines-Barroso, Yolanda García-Álvarez, Francisco J Álvaro-Afonso, José Luis Lázaro-Martínez
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis.","authors":"Mateo López-Moral, Marta García-Madrid, Raúl J Molines-Barroso, Yolanda García-Álvarez, Francisco J Álvaro-Afonso, José Luis Lázaro-Martínez","doi":"10.1089/wound.2023.0135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aims to analyze the potential diagnostic capability of ultrasonography (US) in detecting diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). <b>Approach:</b> A 1-year prospective study was conducted on 47 consecutive patients with active DFUs and suspicion of DFO at a specialized diabetic foot unit. The following ultrasonographic features were evaluated at baseline: (1) periosteal reaction; (2) periosteal elevation; (3) cortical disruption; (4) sequestrum; and (5) positive power Doppler. The primary outcome measure aimed to establish the effectiveness of ultrasonographic features compared with aseptic bone culture for diagnosing DFO. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasonographic features. Sample size could not be determined as it is the first study to assess ultrasonographic features for the diagnosis of DFO. The research adhered to the guidelines for diagnostic accuracy studies (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies [STARD] 2015). <b>Results:</b> All patients (<i>n</i> = 24) diagnosed with DFO exhibited positive power Doppler, resulting in a sensitivity (S) and specificity (SP) of 1 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 1 (<i>p</i> < 0.001 [1-1]). Cortical disruption was present in 23 patients (95.8%) with DFO, yielding an S of 0.93, SP of 1, and AUC of 0.96 (<i>p</i> < 0.001 [0.88-1]). <b>Innovation:</b> It validates the diagnostic value of US for DFO as it is the first and largest study of its kind to establish a clear reference standard to guide clinician decision-making. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study demonstrates the effectiveness of cortical disruption and positive power Doppler in assessing DFO through US.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":"167-175"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2023.0135","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to analyze the potential diagnostic capability of ultrasonography (US) in detecting diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Approach: A 1-year prospective study was conducted on 47 consecutive patients with active DFUs and suspicion of DFO at a specialized diabetic foot unit. The following ultrasonographic features were evaluated at baseline: (1) periosteal reaction; (2) periosteal elevation; (3) cortical disruption; (4) sequestrum; and (5) positive power Doppler. The primary outcome measure aimed to establish the effectiveness of ultrasonographic features compared with aseptic bone culture for diagnosing DFO. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasonographic features. Sample size could not be determined as it is the first study to assess ultrasonographic features for the diagnosis of DFO. The research adhered to the guidelines for diagnostic accuracy studies (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies [STARD] 2015). Results: All patients (n = 24) diagnosed with DFO exhibited positive power Doppler, resulting in a sensitivity (S) and specificity (SP) of 1 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 1 (p < 0.001 [1-1]). Cortical disruption was present in 23 patients (95.8%) with DFO, yielding an S of 0.93, SP of 1, and AUC of 0.96 (p < 0.001 [0.88-1]). Innovation: It validates the diagnostic value of US for DFO as it is the first and largest study of its kind to establish a clear reference standard to guide clinician decision-making. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of cortical disruption and positive power Doppler in assessing DFO through US.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Wound Care rapidly shares research from bench to bedside, with wound care applications for burns, major trauma, blast injuries, surgery, and diabetic ulcers. The Journal provides a critical, peer-reviewed forum for the field of tissue injury and repair, with an emphasis on acute and chronic wounds.
Advances in Wound Care explores novel research approaches and practices to deliver the latest scientific discoveries and developments.
Advances in Wound Care coverage includes:
Skin bioengineering,
Skin and tissue regeneration,
Acute, chronic, and complex wounds,
Dressings,
Anti-scar strategies,
Inflammation,
Burns and healing,
Biofilm,
Oxygen and angiogenesis,
Critical limb ischemia,
Military wound care,
New devices and technologies.