Functional annotation of insecta transcriptomes: A cautionary tale from Lepidoptera

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Naya McCartney , Gayathri Kondakath , Albert Tai , Barry A. Trimmer
{"title":"Functional annotation of insecta transcriptomes: A cautionary tale from Lepidoptera","authors":"Naya McCartney ,&nbsp;Gayathri Kondakath ,&nbsp;Albert Tai ,&nbsp;Barry A. Trimmer","doi":"10.1016/j.ibmb.2023.104038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Functional annotation is a critical step in the analysis of genomic data, as it provides insight into the function of individual genes and the pathways in which they participate. Currently, there is no consensus on the best computational approach for assigning functional annotation. This study compares three functional annotation methods (BLAST, eggNOG-Mapper, and InterProScan) in their ability to assign Gene Ontology terms in two species of Insecta with differing levels of annotation, </span><span><em>Bombyx mori</em></span> and <span><em>Manduca sexta</em></span>. The methods were compared for their annotation coverage, number of term assignments, term agreement and non-overlapping terms. Here we show that there are large discrepancies in gene ontology term assignment among the three computational methods, which could lead to confounding interpretations of data and non-comparable results. This study provide insight into the strengths and weaknesses of each computational method and highlight the need for more standardized methods of functional annotation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":330,"journal":{"name":"Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 104038"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965174823001327","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Functional annotation is a critical step in the analysis of genomic data, as it provides insight into the function of individual genes and the pathways in which they participate. Currently, there is no consensus on the best computational approach for assigning functional annotation. This study compares three functional annotation methods (BLAST, eggNOG-Mapper, and InterProScan) in their ability to assign Gene Ontology terms in two species of Insecta with differing levels of annotation, Bombyx mori and Manduca sexta. The methods were compared for their annotation coverage, number of term assignments, term agreement and non-overlapping terms. Here we show that there are large discrepancies in gene ontology term assignment among the three computational methods, which could lead to confounding interpretations of data and non-comparable results. This study provide insight into the strengths and weaknesses of each computational method and highlight the need for more standardized methods of functional annotation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

昆虫转录组的功能注释:鳞翅目的一个警示故事。
功能注释是基因组数据分析的关键步骤,因为它提供了对单个基因功能及其参与途径的洞察。目前,对于分配函数注释的最佳计算方法还没有达成共识。本研究比较了三种功能标注方法(BLAST、eggNOG-Mapper和InterProScan)对家蚕和雌雄家蚕两种不同标注水平昆虫物种基因本体术语的标注能力。比较了这些方法的注释覆盖率、术语分配数量、术语协议和非重叠术语。本文表明,三种计算方法在基因本体术语分配上存在很大差异,这可能导致数据解释混淆和结果不可比较。本研究深入分析了每种计算方法的优缺点,并强调了对更标准化的功能注释方法的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
105
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: This international journal publishes original contributions and mini-reviews in the fields of insect biochemistry and insect molecular biology. Main areas of interest are neurochemistry, hormone and pheromone biochemistry, enzymes and metabolism, hormone action and gene regulation, gene characterization and structure, pharmacology, immunology and cell and tissue culture. Papers on the biochemistry and molecular biology of other groups of arthropods are published if of general interest to the readership. Technique papers will be considered for publication if they significantly advance the field of insect biochemistry and molecular biology in the opinion of the Editors and Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信