Exploring Quantity and Diversity of Informal Digital Learning of English (IDLE): A Review of Selected Paper

Utamax Pub Date : 2019-07-09 DOI:10.31849/utamax.v1i1.2551
Nofita Nofita, Ratih Saltri Yudar, Mutia Sari Nursafira
{"title":"Exploring Quantity and Diversity of Informal Digital Learning of English (IDLE): A Review of Selected Paper","authors":"Nofita Nofita, Ratih Saltri Yudar, Mutia Sari Nursafira","doi":"10.31849/utamax.v1i1.2551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reviews research on informal digital English (IDLE) learning that has increased in the field of English language teaching to other language speakers and computer-assisted language learning written by Ju Seong Lee (2019), entitled Quantity and Diversity of informal digital learning of English published by Language Learning & Technology. This present paper uses descriptive qualitative analysis in an attempt to understand how the quantity and diversity of IDLE can make a unique contribution to the English language outcomes of EFL learners from the researcher's perspective. Lee uses hierarchical linear regression analysis to show that IDLE Quantity, Age, and Major are significant predictors of two affective variables (Confidence and Pleasure), while IDLE Diversity and Major significantly predict productive language outcomes (Speaking and Productive Vocabulary Knowledge), score in the standard English Test (TOEIC), and one affective variable (Lack of Anxiety). This present article aims to review and discuss the findings on the strengths and the weaknesses found in Lee’s 2019 article. The article Lee made seems to possess a clear flow on how to explain these two types of education and make this article easy to understand. Therefore, the replication of Lee’s research is easy enough for similar research purposes.","PeriodicalId":34818,"journal":{"name":"Utamax","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utamax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31849/utamax.v1i1.2551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This article reviews research on informal digital English (IDLE) learning that has increased in the field of English language teaching to other language speakers and computer-assisted language learning written by Ju Seong Lee (2019), entitled Quantity and Diversity of informal digital learning of English published by Language Learning & Technology. This present paper uses descriptive qualitative analysis in an attempt to understand how the quantity and diversity of IDLE can make a unique contribution to the English language outcomes of EFL learners from the researcher's perspective. Lee uses hierarchical linear regression analysis to show that IDLE Quantity, Age, and Major are significant predictors of two affective variables (Confidence and Pleasure), while IDLE Diversity and Major significantly predict productive language outcomes (Speaking and Productive Vocabulary Knowledge), score in the standard English Test (TOEIC), and one affective variable (Lack of Anxiety). This present article aims to review and discuss the findings on the strengths and the weaknesses found in Lee’s 2019 article. The article Lee made seems to possess a clear flow on how to explain these two types of education and make this article easy to understand. Therefore, the replication of Lee’s research is easy enough for similar research purposes.
非正式数字英语学习(IDLE)的数量与多样性探讨:论文选集综述
本文回顾了Ju Seong Lee(2019)在英语语言教学和计算机辅助语言学习领域对非正式数字英语(IDLE)学习的研究,该研究发表在《语言学习与技术》杂志上,题为《英语非正式数字学习的数量和多样性》。本文采用描述性定性分析的方法,试图从研究者的角度来理解外语学习者的英语学习成绩如何受到外语学习者数量和多样性的独特影响。Lee使用层次线性回归分析表明,IDLE数量、年龄和专业是两个情感变量(信心和快乐)的显著预测因子,而IDLE多样性和专业显著预测生产性语言结果(口语和生产性词汇知识)、标准英语考试(托业)分数和一个情感变量(缺乏焦虑)。本文旨在回顾和讨论关于Lee 2019年文章中发现的优势和劣势的研究结果。李的文章似乎对如何解释这两种类型的教育有一个清晰的流程,使这篇文章易于理解。因此,对于类似的研究目的,复制李教授的研究是很容易的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信