Exploring the Use of Point of Care Ultrasound in Screening for Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

O. Hernández, Zoilo K Suarez, Talwinder K Nagi, M. A. Haider, Charles Vallejo, Fatima Ahson
{"title":"Exploring the Use of Point of Care Ultrasound in Screening for Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"O. Hernández, Zoilo K Suarez, Talwinder K Nagi, M. A. Haider, Charles Vallejo, Fatima Ahson","doi":"10.33696/gastroenterology.4.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major cause of cirrhosis and liver failure globally. Despite its broad impact, screening recommendations for NAFLD remain varied based between gastrointestinal societies. Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as a new form of screening and diagnosing intrabdominal pathologies including NAFLD. We aimed to estimate the effectiveness of POCUS in screening for NAFLD compared to formal ultrasound when screening by general practitioners trained in ultrasonography. Data was collected from Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar using search terms related to POCUS and NAFLD screening. Observational cross-sectional studies were included in our analysis. Reviewers evaluated articles for eligibility and extracted data for analysis. The risk of bias was assessed by reviewers using a validated risk of bias assessment tool. Discrepancies between authors were resolved by a third reviewer or by consensus. Our review found 3 studies (n = 428) that met our eligibility criteria. Our review found that POCUS was 93% sensitive and 98% specific when screening for NAFLD compared to formal ultrasound. We concluded that POCUS is an acceptable method of screening for NAFLD when used by general practitioners trained in ultrasonography. Further, more robust, studies are required to validate the findings of our review and elucidate further horizons on this emerging screening method.","PeriodicalId":8277,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gastroenterology Research","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gastroenterology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33696/gastroenterology.4.042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major cause of cirrhosis and liver failure globally. Despite its broad impact, screening recommendations for NAFLD remain varied based between gastrointestinal societies. Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as a new form of screening and diagnosing intrabdominal pathologies including NAFLD. We aimed to estimate the effectiveness of POCUS in screening for NAFLD compared to formal ultrasound when screening by general practitioners trained in ultrasonography. Data was collected from Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar using search terms related to POCUS and NAFLD screening. Observational cross-sectional studies were included in our analysis. Reviewers evaluated articles for eligibility and extracted data for analysis. The risk of bias was assessed by reviewers using a validated risk of bias assessment tool. Discrepancies between authors were resolved by a third reviewer or by consensus. Our review found 3 studies (n = 428) that met our eligibility criteria. Our review found that POCUS was 93% sensitive and 98% specific when screening for NAFLD compared to formal ultrasound. We concluded that POCUS is an acceptable method of screening for NAFLD when used by general practitioners trained in ultrasonography. Further, more robust, studies are required to validate the findings of our review and elucidate further horizons on this emerging screening method.
探索使用护理点超声筛查非酒精性脂肪性肝病:系统文献综述和荟萃分析
非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)是全球肝硬化和肝功能衰竭的主要原因。尽管NAFLD具有广泛的影响,但胃肠学会对NAFLD的筛查建议仍各不相同。护理点超声(POCUS)已成为筛查和诊断腹腔内病理包括NAFLD的新形式。我们的目的是评估POCUS在筛查NAFLD时的有效性,与接受过超声检查培训的全科医生进行筛查时的效果相比。使用与POCUS和NAFLD筛查相关的搜索词从Cochrane、PubMed、Embase和Google Scholar收集数据。观察性横断面研究纳入了我们的分析。审稿人评估文章的合格性并提取数据进行分析。评审人员使用经过验证的偏倚风险评估工具评估偏倚风险。作者之间的差异由第三方审稿人或协商一致解决。我们的综述发现3项研究(n = 428)符合我们的入选标准。我们的综述发现,与常规超声相比,POCUS筛查NAFLD的敏感性为93%,特异性为98%。我们的结论是POCUS是一种可接受的NAFLD筛查方法,当全科医生使用超声检查时。此外,还需要更有力的研究来验证我们综述的发现,并进一步阐明这种新兴筛选方法的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信