Identifying main evolutionary mechanisms shaping genetic variation of Leuciscus cephalus L. 1758 (Cyprinidae) in Western Greece: discordance between methods

Bruno Guinand , Jean-Dominique Durand , Jean Laroche
{"title":"Identifying main evolutionary mechanisms shaping genetic variation of Leuciscus cephalus L. 1758 (Cyprinidae) in Western Greece: discordance between methods","authors":"Bruno Guinand ,&nbsp;Jean-Dominique Durand ,&nbsp;Jean Laroche","doi":"10.1016/S0764-4469(01)01361-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Numerous methods can be used in intraspecific phylogeographic studies to infer the evolutionary mechanisms that shaped observed genetic variation in populations. However, these methods are scarcely used jointly, and the evolutionary outcomes they could propose are not fully compared. In this study, using a chub (<em>Leuciscus cephalus</em>; Cyprinidae) mitochondrial DNA data set (13 populations in Western Greece, 14 haplotypes), we compare three distinct ‘historical’ methods that could possibly infer relative importance of basic evolutionary mechanisms (isolation vs migration) shaping genetic variation: the nested clade analysis, the <em>Ψ</em>-test and the ‘mismatch distributions’. Taking together, interpretations of these analyses allow to draw a picture of the evolutionary history of chub in Western Greece based on isolation and genetic drift for higher clades. However, results issued each method can differ for low differentiated clades. We discuss such differences and suggest that methods should be used jointly in phylogeographic studies for a better evaluation of the evolutionary mechanisms that shaped genetic variation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100306,"journal":{"name":"Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie","volume":"324 11","pages":"Pages 1045-1060"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0764-4469(01)01361-0","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0764446901013610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Numerous methods can be used in intraspecific phylogeographic studies to infer the evolutionary mechanisms that shaped observed genetic variation in populations. However, these methods are scarcely used jointly, and the evolutionary outcomes they could propose are not fully compared. In this study, using a chub (Leuciscus cephalus; Cyprinidae) mitochondrial DNA data set (13 populations in Western Greece, 14 haplotypes), we compare three distinct ‘historical’ methods that could possibly infer relative importance of basic evolutionary mechanisms (isolation vs migration) shaping genetic variation: the nested clade analysis, the Ψ-test and the ‘mismatch distributions’. Taking together, interpretations of these analyses allow to draw a picture of the evolutionary history of chub in Western Greece based on isolation and genetic drift for higher clades. However, results issued each method can differ for low differentiated clades. We discuss such differences and suggest that methods should be used jointly in phylogeographic studies for a better evaluation of the evolutionary mechanisms that shaped genetic variation.

鉴定西希腊斑马鱼(Leuciscus cephalus L. 1758)遗传变异的主要进化机制:方法间的不一致
多种方法可用于种内系统地理学研究,以推断形成观察到的种群遗传变异的进化机制。然而,这些方法很少联合使用,它们可能提出的进化结果也没有得到充分的比较。在本研究中,使用一根(白鲑;Cyprinidae)线粒体DNA数据集(西希腊的13个种群,14个单倍型),我们比较了三种不同的“历史”方法,这些方法可能推断出形成遗传变异的基本进化机制(隔离vs迁移)的相对重要性:嵌套进化支分析,Ψ-test和“错配分布”。综上所述,对这些分析的解释可以在隔离和高级分支的遗传漂变的基础上,描绘出西希腊俱乐部的进化史。然而,对于低分化的进化枝,每种方法得出的结果可能不同。我们讨论了这些差异,并建议在系统地理学研究中联合使用这些方法,以便更好地评估形成遗传变异的进化机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信