C. Tampaktsi, A. Gancel, J. Escudier, A. Samson, H. Ojeda, L. Pic, J. Rousseau, P. Gauthier, D. Viguier, M. Furet, Pierre-Louis Teissèdre
{"title":"Phenolic potential of new red hybrid grape varieties to produce quality wines and identification by the malvin","authors":"C. Tampaktsi, A. Gancel, J. Escudier, A. Samson, H. Ojeda, L. Pic, J. Rousseau, P. Gauthier, D. Viguier, M. Furet, Pierre-Louis Teissèdre","doi":"10.1051/bioconf/20235602012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The hybrids are new varieties that are resistant to the cryptogamic diseases of vines, and they may be a good solution to the reduction of pesticide use. However, these new varieties have appeared recently and only few studies have been conducted to check the quality of the wine that they produce. In this study, wines originated from hybrids were chemically characterized (polyphenols, tannins, anthocyanins, and color analysis). Results show that their oenological parameters were close to those of the Vitis vinifera wines. The wines made from Vinifera (100%), with Vidoc, and all the resistant Bouquets studied are malvidin-3 glucoside dominant, and all the others hybrids varieties are cyanidin dominant. Furthermore, the hybrid wines had a higher concentration in condensed tannins and a lower one in molecular tannins compared with the Vitis vinifera wines, except for the Vidoc wines. As far as the anthocyanin content is concerned, the samples contained anthocyanin diglucosides, with the malvidin-3,5-diglucoside (malvin) the most abundant one. Also, their concentration in molecular anthocyanins were higher than the concentration in normal wines. The Vidoc wines do not contain any malvin. For the other wines, malvin co-eluted with cyanidin-3-O-glucoside and in this case, the cyanidin’s concentration was impressively higher than the Vidoc wines. The current OIV method gives different results for malvidol diglucoside compared to the use of an HPLC chromatography method (HPLC-DAD-QQQ). The current OIV method does not appear reliable in comparison with the HPLC method for detecting malvin. Finally, the hybrid wines had a darker blue/purplish color than the Vitis vinifera wines.","PeriodicalId":8805,"journal":{"name":"BIO Web of Conferences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BIO Web of Conferences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20235602012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The hybrids are new varieties that are resistant to the cryptogamic diseases of vines, and they may be a good solution to the reduction of pesticide use. However, these new varieties have appeared recently and only few studies have been conducted to check the quality of the wine that they produce. In this study, wines originated from hybrids were chemically characterized (polyphenols, tannins, anthocyanins, and color analysis). Results show that their oenological parameters were close to those of the Vitis vinifera wines. The wines made from Vinifera (100%), with Vidoc, and all the resistant Bouquets studied are malvidin-3 glucoside dominant, and all the others hybrids varieties are cyanidin dominant. Furthermore, the hybrid wines had a higher concentration in condensed tannins and a lower one in molecular tannins compared with the Vitis vinifera wines, except for the Vidoc wines. As far as the anthocyanin content is concerned, the samples contained anthocyanin diglucosides, with the malvidin-3,5-diglucoside (malvin) the most abundant one. Also, their concentration in molecular anthocyanins were higher than the concentration in normal wines. The Vidoc wines do not contain any malvin. For the other wines, malvin co-eluted with cyanidin-3-O-glucoside and in this case, the cyanidin’s concentration was impressively higher than the Vidoc wines. The current OIV method gives different results for malvidol diglucoside compared to the use of an HPLC chromatography method (HPLC-DAD-QQQ). The current OIV method does not appear reliable in comparison with the HPLC method for detecting malvin. Finally, the hybrid wines had a darker blue/purplish color than the Vitis vinifera wines.
杂交品种是抗葡萄隐孢子病的新品种,是减少农药使用的一个很好的解决方案。然而,这些新品种是最近才出现的,只有很少的研究来检查它们生产的葡萄酒的质量。在这项研究中,对杂交葡萄酒进行了化学表征(多酚、单宁、花青素和颜色分析)。结果表明,其酿酒参数与葡萄品种接近。用Vinifera(100%)、Vidoc和所有抗花酿造的葡萄酒均以malvidin-3葡萄糖苷为主,其他杂交品种均以花青素为主。此外,除了维多克葡萄酒外,杂交葡萄酒的浓缩单宁浓度高于葡萄品种,分子单宁浓度低于葡萄品种。就花青素含量而言,样品中含有花青素二葡糖苷,其中以马柳苷-3,5-二葡糖苷(malvin)含量最多。它们在分子花青素中的含量也高于普通葡萄酒中的含量。维多克葡萄酒不含马尔文酒。对于其他葡萄酒,马尔文与花青素-3- o-葡萄糖苷共洗脱,在这种情况下,花青素的浓度明显高于维多克葡萄酒。与HPLC色谱法(HPLC- dad - qqq)相比,目前的OIV方法对马尔维多二葡糖苷的测定结果有所不同。与高效液相色谱法相比,目前的紫外分光光度法检测马尔文的可靠性不高。最后,混合葡萄酒的颜色比葡萄葡萄酒更深,呈蓝色/紫色。