{"title":"Entre el mito y la crítica: la memoria del 68 francés","authors":"J. Sánchez-Prieto","doi":"10.3989/ARBOR.2018.787N1005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"May 1968, more than a debate between memory and history, is a debate between myth and critique. Le mai francais has been a continuous resource of debate and proliferation of ideas, and for this reason the recent position related to the official account or consensus on its significance, fabricated out of the commemorations, lacks plausibility. Starting with the double outburst of word and action (performance) which brought with it the movement, this paper takes into account the role played by the intellectuals in sixty-eight, before and after the May-June epicentre. From this perspective, it will be easier to determine the extent to which the intellectual debate maintained by the commemorative ritual either resulted in a separate ideology or thinking of the movement, which blurred the edges of its main contexts. By contrast, one could also conclude by supporting the present legacy of the 68th, quintessential to its memory.","PeriodicalId":45891,"journal":{"name":"ARBOR-CIENCIA PENSAMIENTO Y CULTURA","volume":"4 1","pages":"432"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARBOR-CIENCIA PENSAMIENTO Y CULTURA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/ARBOR.2018.787N1005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
May 1968, more than a debate between memory and history, is a debate between myth and critique. Le mai francais has been a continuous resource of debate and proliferation of ideas, and for this reason the recent position related to the official account or consensus on its significance, fabricated out of the commemorations, lacks plausibility. Starting with the double outburst of word and action (performance) which brought with it the movement, this paper takes into account the role played by the intellectuals in sixty-eight, before and after the May-June epicentre. From this perspective, it will be easier to determine the extent to which the intellectual debate maintained by the commemorative ritual either resulted in a separate ideology or thinking of the movement, which blurred the edges of its main contexts. By contrast, one could also conclude by supporting the present legacy of the 68th, quintessential to its memory.
1968年5月,不仅仅是一场记忆与历史的辩论,更是一场神话与批判的辩论。Le mai francais一直是辩论和思想扩散的持续资源,因此,最近与官方描述有关的立场或对其重要性的共识,是根据纪念活动捏造的,缺乏合理性。本文从引起运动的言语与行动(表演)的双重爆发出发,考察六八年五六月大震中前后知识分子所起的作用。从这个角度来看,更容易确定纪念仪式所维持的智力辩论在多大程度上导致了一种独立的意识形态或对运动的思考,这模糊了其主要背景的边缘。相比之下,人们也可以通过支持第68届联邦政府目前的遗产来得出结论,这是对其记忆的典型体现。
期刊介绍:
Arbor is a bimonthly Journal publishing original articles on Science, Thought and Culture. By examining different topics with a rigorous scientific approach, Arbor intends to service the Spanish society and scientific community by providing information, updating, reflection and debate on subjects of current interest. Arbor is among the oldest Journals published by CSIC, and is open to researchers and Culture creators and managers, both Spanish and foreign.