Assessing the Economic Impacts of an Economic Partnership Agreement on Nigeria

S. Andriamananjara, P. Brenton, Jan Erik von Uexkull, P. Walkenhorst
{"title":"Assessing the Economic Impacts of an Economic Partnership Agreement on Nigeria","authors":"S. Andriamananjara, P. Brenton, Jan Erik von Uexkull, P. Walkenhorst","doi":"10.1596/1813-9450-4920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study discusses potential economic implications for Nigeria of an Economic Partnership Agreement with the European Union. It uses the World Bank’s Tariff Reform Impact Simulation Tool to assess the effects of preferential tariff liberalization with respect to the European Union. The results suggest that the impact of an Economic Partnership Agreement on total imports into Nigeria will be slight. This is in part because the Agreement will likely allow the most protected sectors to be excluded from liberalization, and also because where substantial tariffs are involved much of the increase in imports from the European Union will occur at the expense of other suppliers of imports. It is this trade diversion, arising from the discriminatory nature of the EPA, which generates a negative welfare impact of the tariff reforms. One way for Nigeria to limit these losses is to pursue non-preferential trade liberalization before implementing an EPA. The paper looks at the large number of import bans in Nigeria and argues that the positive impact on welfare of removing these import bans is likely to be substantial. Their removal would undermine a major reason for cross border smuggling and pave the way for a return to normal regional trade flows. The paper shows how an Economic Partnership Agreement presents an opportunity for accelerating the reforms that are needed to support a strategy to increase regional and global trade integration. Such an agreement is more likely to have positive and significant impacts when integrated into a comprehensive strategy toward competitiveness and alleviation of the supply constraints that have stifled the impact of previous trade agreements. Key issues that should be addressed include liberalization and regulatory strengthening of services sectors to ensure that all firms in Nigeria have access to efficiently produced backbone services and initiatives to address the country’s poor trade logistics performance.","PeriodicalId":14396,"journal":{"name":"International Trade","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Trade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

This study discusses potential economic implications for Nigeria of an Economic Partnership Agreement with the European Union. It uses the World Bank’s Tariff Reform Impact Simulation Tool to assess the effects of preferential tariff liberalization with respect to the European Union. The results suggest that the impact of an Economic Partnership Agreement on total imports into Nigeria will be slight. This is in part because the Agreement will likely allow the most protected sectors to be excluded from liberalization, and also because where substantial tariffs are involved much of the increase in imports from the European Union will occur at the expense of other suppliers of imports. It is this trade diversion, arising from the discriminatory nature of the EPA, which generates a negative welfare impact of the tariff reforms. One way for Nigeria to limit these losses is to pursue non-preferential trade liberalization before implementing an EPA. The paper looks at the large number of import bans in Nigeria and argues that the positive impact on welfare of removing these import bans is likely to be substantial. Their removal would undermine a major reason for cross border smuggling and pave the way for a return to normal regional trade flows. The paper shows how an Economic Partnership Agreement presents an opportunity for accelerating the reforms that are needed to support a strategy to increase regional and global trade integration. Such an agreement is more likely to have positive and significant impacts when integrated into a comprehensive strategy toward competitiveness and alleviation of the supply constraints that have stifled the impact of previous trade agreements. Key issues that should be addressed include liberalization and regulatory strengthening of services sectors to ensure that all firms in Nigeria have access to efficiently produced backbone services and initiatives to address the country’s poor trade logistics performance.
评估经济伙伴关系协定对尼日利亚的经济影响
本研究讨论了与欧盟签订经济伙伴关系协定对尼日利亚的潜在经济影响。它使用世界银行的关税改革影响模拟工具来评估优惠关税自由化对欧盟的影响。结果表明,经济伙伴关系协定对尼日利亚进口总额的影响将是轻微的。这在一定程度上是因为该协定可能会允许最受保护的部门被排除在自由化之外,也因为在涉及大量关税的情况下,从欧盟进口的大部分增加将以损害其他进口供应商的利益为代价。正是由于环境保护协定的歧视性,这种贸易转移产生了关税改革对福利的负面影响。尼日利亚限制这些损失的一个办法是在执行环境保护协定之前实行非优惠贸易自由化。这篇论文着眼于尼日利亚大量的进口禁令,并认为取消这些进口禁令对福利的积极影响可能是巨大的。它们的清除将破坏跨境走私的一个主要原因,并为恢复正常的区域贸易流动铺平道路。报告指出,《经济伙伴关系协定》为加快改革提供了机会,而这些改革是支持加强区域和全球贸易一体化战略所必需的。如果将这样一项协定纳入一项全面的战略,以提高竞争力和缓解抑制以往贸易协定影响的供应限制,则更有可能产生积极和重大的影响。应解决的关键问题包括服务业的自由化和加强监管,以确保尼日利亚的所有公司都能获得高效生产的骨干服务,并采取措施解决该国糟糕的贸易物流表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信