A scoping review of the school-aged stuttering intervention literature

Q2 Social Sciences

Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention Pub Date : 2021-09-19 DOI:10.1080/17489539.2021.1976964

Rizwana B. Mallick, H. Kathard, L. Thabane, M. Pillay

{"title":"A scoping review of the school-aged stuttering intervention literature","authors":"Rizwana B. Mallick, H. Kathard, L. Thabane, M. Pillay","doi":"10.1080/17489539.2021.1976964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We explore school-aged (6–14 years old) stuttering interventions for children who stutter (CWS) using a scoping review. Database searches were conducted (EBSCO host, PubMed, PsycINFO, Academic Search Premier, MEDLINE, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), Health Source (consumer edition), Africa-wide Information, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Dissertation abstracts International, the Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), 15 Cochrane Methodology Register, Education Resource Information Center, Google Scholar, manual searching using reference lists and gray literature) from the inception of the databases until June 2018. Ten school-aged stuttering intervention studies met the inclusion criteria of this study, which were conducted between 1982 and 2016. The 10 studies used quantitative pretest posttest designs with low to moderate quality, according to GRADE. ICF showed a dominance of interventions targeted and measured within the domain of body structures and function with treatment effects focused predominantly on traditional individualized speech fluency measures. Studies were conducted in Australia (n = 3), United States of America (n = 3), Canada (n = 2), Islamic Republic of Iran (n = 1) and South Africa (n = 1). The findings lead to the authors questioning knowledge production and its influence on evidence-based literature and practices.","PeriodicalId":39977,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","volume":"24 1","pages":"194 - 206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2021.1976964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract We explore school-aged (6–14 years old) stuttering interventions for children who stutter (CWS) using a scoping review. Database searches were conducted (EBSCO host, PubMed, PsycINFO, Academic Search Premier, MEDLINE, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), Health Source (consumer edition), Africa-wide Information, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Dissertation abstracts International, the Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), 15 Cochrane Methodology Register, Education Resource Information Center, Google Scholar, manual searching using reference lists and gray literature) from the inception of the databases until June 2018. Ten school-aged stuttering intervention studies met the inclusion criteria of this study, which were conducted between 1982 and 2016. The 10 studies used quantitative pretest posttest designs with low to moderate quality, according to GRADE. ICF showed a dominance of interventions targeted and measured within the domain of body structures and function with treatment effects focused predominantly on traditional individualized speech fluency measures. Studies were conducted in Australia (n = 3), United States of America (n = 3), Canada (n = 2), Islamic Republic of Iran (n = 1) and South Africa (n = 1). The findings lead to the authors questioning knowledge production and its influence on evidence-based literature and practices.

查看原文本刊更多论文

学龄口吃干预文献综述

摘要本研究旨在探讨学龄期(6-14岁)口吃儿童(CWS)的干预措施。进行数据库检索(EBSCO主机、PubMed、PsycINFO、学术检索Premier、MEDLINE、教育资源信息中心(ERIC)、健康资源(消费者版)、非洲信息、护理和联合健康累积索引(CINAHL)、国际论文摘要、Cochrane图书馆(Cochrane系统评价数据库、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(Central)、15 Cochrane方法学注册库、教育资源信息中心、从数据库建立到2018年6月，谷歌学术(使用参考列表和灰色文献进行人工搜索)。1982年至2016年间进行的10项学龄口吃干预研究符合本研究的纳入标准。根据GRADE，这10项研究采用了低到中等质量的定量前测后测设计。ICF显示针对身体结构和功能领域的干预措施占主导地位，治疗效果主要集中在传统的个性化语言流畅性测量上。在澳大利亚(n = 3)、美利坚合众国(n = 3)、加拿大(n = 2)、伊朗伊斯兰共和国(n = 1)和南非(n = 1)进行了研究。研究结果导致作者质疑知识生产及其对循证文献和实践的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention (EBCAI) brings together professionals who work in clinical and educational practice as well as researchers from all disciplines to promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in serving individuals with communication impairments. The primary aims of EBCAI are to: Promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in communication assessment and intervention; Appraise the latest and best communication assessment and intervention studies so as to facilitate the use of research findings in clinical and educational practice; Provide a forum for discussions that advance EBP; and Disseminate research on EBP. We target speech-language pathologists, special educators, regular educators, applied behavior analysts, clinical psychologists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists who serve children or adults with communication impairments.