The Irony and the Ecstasy: The Queer Ageing of Pet Shop Boys and LCD Soundsystem in Electronic Dance Music

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Larissa Wodtke
{"title":"The Irony and the Ecstasy: The Queer Ageing of Pet Shop Boys and LCD Soundsystem in Electronic Dance Music","authors":"Larissa Wodtke","doi":"10.12801/1947-5403.2019.11.01.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The English duo Pet Shop Boys and American group LCD Soundsystem are notable for their representation as artists who entered and succeeded in the predominately youthful market of popular music and the hedonistic aesthetic of electronic dance music (EDM) at ages considered old for the industry: 32 for vocalists/lyricists Neil Tennant (Pet Shop Boys) and James Murphy (LCD Soundsystem). Neither of these bands makes straightforward EDM—Pet Shop Boys fall under pop and LCD Soundsystem can be considered post-punk—but both are influenced by the New York City dance scene of the late 70s and early 80s, and are characterized as ironic. I argue that Pet Shop Boys and LCD Soundsystem are ironic because of their belated, knowing position in a genre that privileges the infinite present and unproductive reproduction through repetition. In light of Lee Edelman’s claim that irony is the queerest of rhetorical devices, the ambivalence of Pet Shop Boys’ and LCD Soundsystem’s ostensible lack of youth and the youthful temporality of their EDM aesthetic place them in a queer tension between notions of immediate authenticity and the distance of age.","PeriodicalId":36263,"journal":{"name":"Dancecult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dancecult","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12801/1947-5403.2019.11.01.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The English duo Pet Shop Boys and American group LCD Soundsystem are notable for their representation as artists who entered and succeeded in the predominately youthful market of popular music and the hedonistic aesthetic of electronic dance music (EDM) at ages considered old for the industry: 32 for vocalists/lyricists Neil Tennant (Pet Shop Boys) and James Murphy (LCD Soundsystem). Neither of these bands makes straightforward EDM—Pet Shop Boys fall under pop and LCD Soundsystem can be considered post-punk—but both are influenced by the New York City dance scene of the late 70s and early 80s, and are characterized as ironic. I argue that Pet Shop Boys and LCD Soundsystem are ironic because of their belated, knowing position in a genre that privileges the infinite present and unproductive reproduction through repetition. In light of Lee Edelman’s claim that irony is the queerest of rhetorical devices, the ambivalence of Pet Shop Boys’ and LCD Soundsystem’s ostensible lack of youth and the youthful temporality of their EDM aesthetic place them in a queer tension between notions of immediate authenticity and the distance of age.
讽刺与狂喜:宠物店男孩的古怪老化与电子舞曲中的LCD音响系统
英国二人组合Pet Shop Boys和美国组合LCD Soundsystem以其代表艺术家的身份而闻名,他们进入了以年轻人为主的流行音乐市场,并在电子舞曲(EDM)的享乐主义美学中取得了成功,而在这个行业中,他们被认为是老年人:32岁的主唱/作词人Neil Tennant (Pet Shop Boys)和James Murphy (LCD Soundsystem)。这两支乐队都没有直接的edm风格——pet Shop Boys属于流行风格,LCD Soundsystem属于后朋克风格——但它们都受到了70年代末和80年代初纽约舞蹈场景的影响,并以讽刺为特征。我认为《Pet Shop Boys》和《LCD Soundsystem》是具有讽刺意味的,因为它们在游戏类型中所处的位置是迟来的,即强调无限的当下和通过重复进行的非生产性复制。根据Lee Edelman的说法,反讽是最奇怪的修辞手段,Pet Shop Boys和LCD Soundsystem表面上缺乏青春的矛盾心理,以及他们的EDM美学的青春短暂性,使他们处于一种奇怪的紧张关系中,即直接真实性和年龄距离的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dancecult
Dancecult Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信