Self-Assessment of General Education and Resource Teachers to Work in The Paradigm of Inclusive Education

IF 0.8 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Zamfirov, Emilia Evgenieva, Margarita Bakracheva
{"title":"Self-Assessment of General Education and Resource Teachers to Work in The Paradigm of Inclusive Education","authors":"M. Zamfirov, Emilia Evgenieva, Margarita Bakracheva","doi":"10.53656/str2023-3-1-sel","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the qualitative results obtained from a study of pedagogical specialists' self-assessment of their professional comfort working in an inclusive environment – 151 teachers and 150 resource teachers. The work of pedagogical specialists today is in the process of implementation and development of a new normative system, and tracking their evaluation and self-assessment is informative not only for their satisfaction, but also for the quality of normative provision of the process of education of children and students with different abilities. On the basis of the analysis, a system of conclusions based on the subjective selfassessments is made in the direction of: the need for targeted support of both general education and resource teachers in three directions: 1) logistical through the development of ready-to-use methods for identification and orientation of the necessary actions for the first group and unified validated diagnostic methods for the second group; 2) taking into account the specificities of educational institutions, where there are different but essential needs for effective work, some of which can be addressed locally; 3) receiving regular feedback for the purpose of improving the regulatory framework.","PeriodicalId":40820,"journal":{"name":"Strategies for Policy in Science and Education-Strategii na Obrazovatelnata i Nauchnata Politika","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategies for Policy in Science and Education-Strategii na Obrazovatelnata i Nauchnata Politika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53656/str2023-3-1-sel","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the qualitative results obtained from a study of pedagogical specialists' self-assessment of their professional comfort working in an inclusive environment – 151 teachers and 150 resource teachers. The work of pedagogical specialists today is in the process of implementation and development of a new normative system, and tracking their evaluation and self-assessment is informative not only for their satisfaction, but also for the quality of normative provision of the process of education of children and students with different abilities. On the basis of the analysis, a system of conclusions based on the subjective selfassessments is made in the direction of: the need for targeted support of both general education and resource teachers in three directions: 1) logistical through the development of ready-to-use methods for identification and orientation of the necessary actions for the first group and unified validated diagnostic methods for the second group; 2) taking into account the specificities of educational institutions, where there are different but essential needs for effective work, some of which can be addressed locally; 3) receiving regular feedback for the purpose of improving the regulatory framework.
全纳教育范式下通识教育与资源教师工作的自我评价
本文以151名教师和150名资源教师为研究对象,对在包容性环境中工作的教学专家的专业舒适度自我评价进行了定性分析。今天,教育学专家的工作正处于实施和发展一种新的规范体系的过程中,跟踪他们的评价和自我评估不仅对他们的满意度有帮助,而且对不同能力的儿童和学生的教育过程的规范提供的质量也有帮助。在分析的基础上,基于主观自我评估的结论体系在以下三个方向上得出:通识教育和资源教师需要有针对性的支持:1)后勤通过开发现成的方法来识别和指导第一组必要的行动,并为第二组提供统一的验证诊断方法;2)考虑到教育机构的具体情况,这些机构在有效工作方面有不同但基本的需求,其中一些可以在当地解决;3)定期接收反馈,以完善监管框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信