Antropologia della dipendenza: il lavoro e la costituzione dell'essere umano

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Acta Philosophica Pub Date : 2007-01-01 DOI:10.1400/78206
M. P. Chirinos
{"title":"Antropologia della dipendenza: il lavoro e la costituzione dell'essere umano","authors":"M. P. Chirinos","doi":"10.1400/78206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Starting with he modern notion of homo faber in different authors, the ariticle criticizes the economist definition of labor and the figure of animal laborans developed by Hannah Arendt and followed by Dominique Meda. Work here becomes understood without any anthropological dimension. Alternatively, the article offers a notion of work rooted in man, but one that is far from that of the modern humanists, because it starts with the anthropology of dependence, which according to Alasdair MacIntyre, reveals a non-autocratic man, one that is vulnerable and in need of treatment. At the same time, this condition demands all the range of corporeal activity – manual labor –, which is intrinsically human because it manifests reason and liberty. The work is here defined as Aristotelian poiesis, not as an isolated dimension but in connection with theoretical reason and with virtue. Work reveals a practical rationality. Among different works, those manual and also those domestic can restore to a technological society a more human face ; because of the care that characterizes them, they enrich interpersonal relations.","PeriodicalId":41562,"journal":{"name":"Acta Philosophica","volume":"14 1","pages":"1000-1018"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Philosophica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/78206","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Starting with he modern notion of homo faber in different authors, the ariticle criticizes the economist definition of labor and the figure of animal laborans developed by Hannah Arendt and followed by Dominique Meda. Work here becomes understood without any anthropological dimension. Alternatively, the article offers a notion of work rooted in man, but one that is far from that of the modern humanists, because it starts with the anthropology of dependence, which according to Alasdair MacIntyre, reveals a non-autocratic man, one that is vulnerable and in need of treatment. At the same time, this condition demands all the range of corporeal activity – manual labor –, which is intrinsically human because it manifests reason and liberty. The work is here defined as Aristotelian poiesis, not as an isolated dimension but in connection with theoretical reason and with virtue. Work reveals a practical rationality. Among different works, those manual and also those domestic can restore to a technological society a more human face ; because of the care that characterizes them, they enrich interpersonal relations.
上瘾人类学:人类的劳动和构成
本文从不同作者的现代“人肉人”概念入手,批判了汉娜·阿伦特和多米尼克·梅达对劳动的经济学定义和动物劳动者的形象。在这里,工作被理解为没有任何人类学的维度。另外,这篇文章提出了一种根植于人的工作观念,但与现代人文主义者的观念相距甚远,因为它从依赖的人类学开始,根据阿拉斯代尔·麦金太尔的说法,它揭示了一个非专制的人,一个脆弱的、需要治疗的人。同时,这一条件要求所有范围的物质活动——体力劳动——因为它体现了理性和自由,所以本质上是人类的。工作在这里被定义为亚里士多德的创造,不是作为一个孤立的维度,而是与理论理性和美德联系在一起。工作表现出一种实际的理性。在不同的作品中,那些手工的和那些家庭的作品可以为技术社会恢复更人性化的面貌;由于他们的关心,他们丰富了人际关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Philosophica
Acta Philosophica PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信