Pieter Roos Park and public dwelling: displacement in an inner-city Johannesburg public space network

IF 0.3 Q3 AREA STUDIES
T. Middelmann
{"title":"Pieter Roos Park and public dwelling: displacement in an inner-city Johannesburg public space network","authors":"T. Middelmann","doi":"10.1353/trn.2021.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Broad structural problems including poverty, spatial and economic inequality, and unemployment, manifest in public space through informality, homelessness, residential settlement in open space, as well as criminal activity. Often, interventions focus on these symptoms of structural problems without enough attention to the influence of broader factors on public space nor to the impacts and implications of these interventions. My research demonstrates a series of public sector interventions that entailed evictions from public spaces in inner-city Johannesburg. These incrementally increased the residential population of Pieter Roos Park until public authorities again evicted residents in early 2019, many of whom have since returned. Evicting people from public open spaces does not end their homelessness, rather displaces them to different localities, often nearby. Sometimes, the same people return to the same space soon after displacement. Moreover, evictions exacerbate the vulnerability of rough sleepers and perpetuate their state of poverty (often linked to destruction or confiscation of materials for shelter or other belongings). These ‘hard’ interventions are rooted in uncollaborative and fragmented local governance, based on a narrow understanding of public space that lacks consideration of how public space refracts broader socio-spatial dynamics and the complex drivers of homelessness. As such, ‘hard’ approaches to public space management continue to undermine emerging social networks of public dwellers. Therefore, this research argues for a more holistic understanding of and approach to public space as a nexus of urban processes, with an accordingly more integrated approach by related city departments to the issue of public dwelling based on an inclusive, non-punitive policy.","PeriodicalId":45045,"journal":{"name":"Transformation-Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transformation-Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.2021.0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:Broad structural problems including poverty, spatial and economic inequality, and unemployment, manifest in public space through informality, homelessness, residential settlement in open space, as well as criminal activity. Often, interventions focus on these symptoms of structural problems without enough attention to the influence of broader factors on public space nor to the impacts and implications of these interventions. My research demonstrates a series of public sector interventions that entailed evictions from public spaces in inner-city Johannesburg. These incrementally increased the residential population of Pieter Roos Park until public authorities again evicted residents in early 2019, many of whom have since returned. Evicting people from public open spaces does not end their homelessness, rather displaces them to different localities, often nearby. Sometimes, the same people return to the same space soon after displacement. Moreover, evictions exacerbate the vulnerability of rough sleepers and perpetuate their state of poverty (often linked to destruction or confiscation of materials for shelter or other belongings). These ‘hard’ interventions are rooted in uncollaborative and fragmented local governance, based on a narrow understanding of public space that lacks consideration of how public space refracts broader socio-spatial dynamics and the complex drivers of homelessness. As such, ‘hard’ approaches to public space management continue to undermine emerging social networks of public dwellers. Therefore, this research argues for a more holistic understanding of and approach to public space as a nexus of urban processes, with an accordingly more integrated approach by related city departments to the issue of public dwelling based on an inclusive, non-punitive policy.
Pieter Roos公园和公共住宅:约翰内斯堡市中心公共空间网络中的位移
摘要:包括贫困、空间和经济不平等以及失业在内的广泛结构性问题,在公共空间中通过非正式性、无家可归者、开放空间中的住区以及犯罪活动表现出来。干预措施往往侧重于结构性问题的这些症状,而没有充分注意到更广泛的因素对公共空间的影响,也没有注意到这些干预措施的影响和影响。我的研究展示了一系列公共部门干预措施,包括从约翰内斯堡市中心的公共空间驱逐。这些措施逐渐增加了彼得鲁斯公园的居住人口,直到公共当局在2019年初再次驱逐居民,其中许多人后来又回来了。将人们赶出公共开放空间并不能结束他们的无家可归,而是将他们转移到不同的地方,通常是附近的地方。有时,同样的人在流离失所后不久就会回到同一个地方。此外,驱逐加剧了露宿者的脆弱性,使他们的贫困状态永久化(通常与毁坏或没收住房材料或其他财产有关)。这些“硬”干预植根于不合作和碎片化的地方治理,基于对公共空间的狭隘理解,缺乏考虑公共空间如何折射更广泛的社会空间动态和无家可归的复杂驱动因素。因此,公共空间管理的“硬”方法继续破坏公共居民的新兴社会网络。因此,本研究主张对作为城市进程纽带的公共空间采取更全面的理解和方法,相应的,城市相关部门在包容性、非惩罚性政策的基础上,对公共住宅问题采取更综合的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信