Implicit Motor Sequence Learning in Adults with and Without Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD)

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Charikleia Sinani, Rebecca A. Henderson, Sang-Hoon Yeo, Robert S. Vaughan, Timothy David Punt
{"title":"Implicit Motor Sequence Learning in Adults with and Without Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD)","authors":"Charikleia Sinani,&nbsp;Rebecca A. Henderson,&nbsp;Sang-Hoon Yeo,&nbsp;Robert S. Vaughan,&nbsp;Timothy David Punt","doi":"10.1007/s41252-023-00327-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Even though individuals who have DCD may have difficulties learning a motor skill, few studies have investigated the mechanisms involved. Understanding these mechanisms and whether individuals with DCD show selective deficits would be of theoretical and practical interest. This study examined implicit motor sequence learning in adults with and without DCD using a serial response time (SRT) task.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eleven participants with DCD (according to the DSM-5 criteria) and 18 participants without DCD matched for age, gender and handedness completed a version of the serial response time (SRT) task. Following this, a free generation task (FGT) assessed explicit sequence knowledge.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Both groups were able to complete the SRT task and showed comparable accuracy. A <i>Condition</i> x <i>Block</i> interaction for response time (RT) data during the learning phase was explained by a failure of the DCD group to improve their performance, while the control group showed the typical learning effect of gradually faster RTs. Responses on the FGT revealed that the DCD group also acquired significantly less sequence knowledge than the control group during the task. Controlling for the development of sequence knowledge across the two groups still revealed an implicit learning deficit in the DCD group.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Adults with DCD failed to demonstrate the typical signs of implicit (procedural) learning on an established and influential sequence learning task. In addition, difficulties in acquiring task-related knowledge may point towards multiple difficulties in learning motor skills.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36163,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41252-023-00327-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Even though individuals who have DCD may have difficulties learning a motor skill, few studies have investigated the mechanisms involved. Understanding these mechanisms and whether individuals with DCD show selective deficits would be of theoretical and practical interest. This study examined implicit motor sequence learning in adults with and without DCD using a serial response time (SRT) task.

Methods

Eleven participants with DCD (according to the DSM-5 criteria) and 18 participants without DCD matched for age, gender and handedness completed a version of the serial response time (SRT) task. Following this, a free generation task (FGT) assessed explicit sequence knowledge.

Results

Both groups were able to complete the SRT task and showed comparable accuracy. A Condition x Block interaction for response time (RT) data during the learning phase was explained by a failure of the DCD group to improve their performance, while the control group showed the typical learning effect of gradually faster RTs. Responses on the FGT revealed that the DCD group also acquired significantly less sequence knowledge than the control group during the task. Controlling for the development of sequence knowledge across the two groups still revealed an implicit learning deficit in the DCD group.

Conclusions

Adults with DCD failed to demonstrate the typical signs of implicit (procedural) learning on an established and influential sequence learning task. In addition, difficulties in acquiring task-related knowledge may point towards multiple difficulties in learning motor skills.

发育协调障碍(DCD)成人和非发育协调障碍成人的内隐运动序列学习
目的尽管患有 DCD 的个体在学习某种运动技能时可能会遇到困难,但很少有研究对其中的机制进行调查。了解这些机制以及 DCD 患者是否表现出选择性缺陷将具有理论和实践意义。本研究使用序列反应时间(SRT)任务对患有和不患有 DCD 的成人的内隐运动序列学习进行了研究。方法7 名患有 DCD 的参与者(根据 DSM-5 标准)和 18 名不患有 DCD 的参与者完成了一个版本的序列反应时间(SRT)任务。随后,自由生成任务(FGT)对显性序列知识进行了评估。在学习阶段,反应时间(RT)数据出现了条件 x 组间交互作用,这是因为 DCD 组未能提高其成绩,而对照组则表现出反应时间逐渐加快的典型学习效果。对 FGT 的反应显示,在完成任务期间,DCD 组获得的序列知识也明显少于对照组。在控制了两组的序列知识发展后,我们仍然发现障碍儿童组存在内隐学习缺陷。结论障碍儿童组的成人未能在一项成熟且有影响力的序列学习任务中表现出典型的内隐(程序)学习迹象。此外,在获取任务相关知识方面的困难可能表明他们在学习运动技能方面存在多种困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders publishes high-quality research in the broad area of neurodevelopmental disorders across the lifespan. Study participants may include individuals with:Intellectual and developmental disabilitiesGlobal developmental delayCommunication disordersLanguage disordersSpeech sound disordersChildhood-onset fluency disorders (e.g., stuttering)Social (e.g., pragmatic) communication disordersUnspecified communication disordersAutism spectrum disorder (ASD)Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), specified and unspecifiedSpecific learning disordersMotor disordersDevelopmental coordination disordersStereotypic movement disorderTic disorders, specified and unspecifiedOther neurodevelopmental disorders, specified and unspecifiedPapers may also include studies of participants with neurodegenerative disorders that lead to a decline in intellectual functioning, including Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia, frontotemporal dementia, corticobasal degeneration, Huntington’s disease, and progressive supranuclear palsy. The journal includes empirical, theoretical and review papers on a large variety of issues, populations, and domains, including but not limited to: diagnosis; incidence and prevalence; and educational, pharmacological, behavioral and cognitive behavioral, mindfulness, and psychosocial interventions across the life span. Animal models of basic research that inform the understanding and treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders are also welcomed. The journal is multidisciplinary and multi-theoretical, and encourages research from multiple specialties in the social sciences using quantitative and mixed-method research methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信