Leadership for Empowerment: Analyzing Leadership Practices in a Youth Care Organization Using Peer Video Reflection

IF 2.2 4区 社会学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
A. E. Bunders, J. Broerse, B. Regeer
{"title":"Leadership for Empowerment: Analyzing Leadership Practices in a Youth Care Organization Using Peer Video Reflection","authors":"A. E. Bunders, J. Broerse, B. Regeer","doi":"10.1080/23303131.2021.1961333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In recent years, increased complexity and persistent challenges induced governmental organizations to transform their ways of operating. Inherent to such transformations are shifts in approaches to leadership and organizational learning. However, adopting strategies that empower staff to take complex context-appropriate decisions has shown to be difficult. This paper aims to gain insight into empowering and disempowering leadership practices in complex transformation processes. Team leaders of a governmental organization participated in observing videos of weekly team meetings, noting positive and negative interactions between the peer-team leader and team members. Their observations were analyzed using the four dimensions of psychological empowerment. All team leaders showed empowering and disempowering practices within one case discussion. The findings illustrate in which contexts these practices are triggered. Results help to theoretically elucidate academic debates about the relationships between empowerment and control, differences between empowerment and laissez-faire and between empowering and destructive leadership in human service organizations.","PeriodicalId":46043,"journal":{"name":"Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance","volume":"51 1","pages":"431 - 453"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2021.1961333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT In recent years, increased complexity and persistent challenges induced governmental organizations to transform their ways of operating. Inherent to such transformations are shifts in approaches to leadership and organizational learning. However, adopting strategies that empower staff to take complex context-appropriate decisions has shown to be difficult. This paper aims to gain insight into empowering and disempowering leadership practices in complex transformation processes. Team leaders of a governmental organization participated in observing videos of weekly team meetings, noting positive and negative interactions between the peer-team leader and team members. Their observations were analyzed using the four dimensions of psychological empowerment. All team leaders showed empowering and disempowering practices within one case discussion. The findings illustrate in which contexts these practices are triggered. Results help to theoretically elucidate academic debates about the relationships between empowerment and control, differences between empowerment and laissez-faire and between empowering and destructive leadership in human service organizations.
领导赋权:用同伴视频反思分析青年关怀组织的领导实践
近年来,日益增加的复杂性和持续的挑战促使政府组织改变其运作方式。这种转变所固有的是领导力和组织学习方法的转变。但是,采取使工作人员能够根据具体情况作出复杂决定的战略是很困难的。本文旨在深入了解在复杂的转型过程中授权和不授权的领导实践。某政府机构的团队领导参与观察每周团队会议的视频,注意到同伴团队领导与团队成员之间的积极和消极互动。他们的观察结果用心理赋权的四个维度进行了分析。所有的团队领导都在一个案例讨论中展示了授权和不授权的实践。研究结果说明了这些做法是在何种背景下触发的。研究结果有助于从理论上阐明在人类服务组织中,授权与控制之间的关系、授权与自由放任之间的差异以及授权与破坏性领导之间的学术争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信