Investigating the Applicability of the Newtonian Gravity Concept Inventory to First Year College Students

H. Bani-Salameh, Ahmad F. Subahi, S. Alharbi, Nouf Adegaither, M. Awawdeh, D. Alamoudi, Reem M. Alamoudi
{"title":"Investigating the Applicability of the Newtonian Gravity Concept Inventory to First Year College Students","authors":"H. Bani-Salameh, Ahmad F. Subahi, S. Alharbi, Nouf Adegaither, M. Awawdeh, D. Alamoudi, Reem M. Alamoudi","doi":"10.5296/ije.v14i1.19122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We report on a study of our students’ understanding of gravity using the Newtonian Gravity Concept Inventory (NGCI). This article is supposed to serve two purposes: as a proof of applicability of the test to first year medical students outside the United States and as a general survey of our students’ understanding of gravity. The motivation for this work came initially from students’ misconceptions of gravity and related topics noticed in classrooms. NGCI has 26 multiple-choice questions probing students’ knowledge of gravity in four different domains: Directionality, Gravity as a force, Independence from other forces and threshold. Results confirmed weak overall performance of the 684 students participated in this study (average score of only 38.48%) with misconceptions related to gravity in all four domains. We were able to prove the applicability of the NGCI to our students through calculations of Classical Test Theory statistics and Cronbach’s alpha. We got a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.68, average difficulty index of 0.62 and average discriminatory index of 0.31 with three questions reported as too difficult based on the acceptable range. The test was given to students twice; before and after any gravity-related instructions in class (pre- and post-test). Post-test results will not be discussed here and left for future articles. In this article, we present the pre-test results and compare it to the original work by the authors of the test on astronomy and physics students.","PeriodicalId":31806,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v14i1.19122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We report on a study of our students’ understanding of gravity using the Newtonian Gravity Concept Inventory (NGCI). This article is supposed to serve two purposes: as a proof of applicability of the test to first year medical students outside the United States and as a general survey of our students’ understanding of gravity. The motivation for this work came initially from students’ misconceptions of gravity and related topics noticed in classrooms. NGCI has 26 multiple-choice questions probing students’ knowledge of gravity in four different domains: Directionality, Gravity as a force, Independence from other forces and threshold. Results confirmed weak overall performance of the 684 students participated in this study (average score of only 38.48%) with misconceptions related to gravity in all four domains. We were able to prove the applicability of the NGCI to our students through calculations of Classical Test Theory statistics and Cronbach’s alpha. We got a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.68, average difficulty index of 0.62 and average discriminatory index of 0.31 with three questions reported as too difficult based on the acceptable range. The test was given to students twice; before and after any gravity-related instructions in class (pre- and post-test). Post-test results will not be discussed here and left for future articles. In this article, we present the pre-test results and compare it to the original work by the authors of the test on astronomy and physics students.
探讨牛顿重力概念量表在大学一年级学生中的适用性
我们报告了一项使用牛顿重力概念量表(NGCI)的学生对重力的理解的研究。这篇文章应该有两个目的:证明该测试对美国以外的一年级医学院学生的适用性,并对我们学生对重力的理解进行总体调查。这项工作的动机最初来自学生在课堂上注意到的对重力和相关主题的误解。NGCI有26道选择题,从四个不同的领域探究学生对重力的认识:方向性、重力作为一种力、重力与其他力的独立性和阈值。结果证实了684名学生的整体表现不佳(平均得分仅为38.48%),他们在所有四个领域都对重力有误解。通过经典测试理论统计和Cronbach 's alpha的计算,我们能够证明NGCI对学生的适用性。我们得到的Cronbach 's alpha为0.68,平均难度指数为0.62,平均歧视指数为0.31,根据可接受范围,有3个问题被报告为太难。该测试对学生进行了两次;在课堂上任何与重力相关的指导之前和之后(测试前和测试后)。本文不讨论测试后的结果,将留待以后的文章讨论。在本文中,我们给出了预测结果,并将其与天文学和物理学学生测试作者的原始作品进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书