Is Boyer’s Scholarship Reconsidered Still Relevant: A Case study of a College-Wide Professional Learning Community

Michael E. Houdyshell, J. Sughrue, H. Aydin, Douglas E. Carothers
{"title":"Is Boyer’s Scholarship Reconsidered Still Relevant: A Case study of a College-Wide Professional Learning Community","authors":"Michael E. Houdyshell, J. Sughrue, H. Aydin, Douglas E. Carothers","doi":"10.14434/josotl.v22i1.31185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As universities attempt to integrate academic research into meaningful real-world application, faculty are encouraged to improve, understand, and collaborate on instruction and scholarship. Boyer’s writings on the topic in Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate attempted to engage faculty in this pursuit. One College of Education explored Boyer’s model through faculty participation in a Professional Learning Community (PLC). Using a qualitative case study including a review of documents and faculty focus groups, the researchers studied how faculty were able to infuse components of Boyer’s Scholarship Reconsidered in their work. Findings pointed to enhanced understanding of Boyer’s writings by faculty, but did not result in increased incorporation of his ideas into practice during the PLC. The researchers concluded that improvements in the leadership, design, and application of the PLC could facilitate faculty participation in a PLC and could result in increased engagement and application of Boyer’s writings in their work. \nKeywords: Boyer’s Scholarship Reconsidered, professional learning communities, higher education","PeriodicalId":93822,"journal":{"name":"The journal of scholarship of teaching and learning : JoSoTL","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of scholarship of teaching and learning : JoSoTL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v22i1.31185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

As universities attempt to integrate academic research into meaningful real-world application, faculty are encouraged to improve, understand, and collaborate on instruction and scholarship. Boyer’s writings on the topic in Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate attempted to engage faculty in this pursuit. One College of Education explored Boyer’s model through faculty participation in a Professional Learning Community (PLC). Using a qualitative case study including a review of documents and faculty focus groups, the researchers studied how faculty were able to infuse components of Boyer’s Scholarship Reconsidered in their work. Findings pointed to enhanced understanding of Boyer’s writings by faculty, but did not result in increased incorporation of his ideas into practice during the PLC. The researchers concluded that improvements in the leadership, design, and application of the PLC could facilitate faculty participation in a PLC and could result in increased engagement and application of Boyer’s writings in their work. Keywords: Boyer’s Scholarship Reconsidered, professional learning communities, higher education
重新考虑博耶的奖学金是否仍然适用:一个大学范围内的专业学习社区的案例研究
随着大学试图将学术研究整合到有意义的现实应用中,教师们被鼓励在教学和学术方面提高、理解和合作。博耶在《重新考虑奖学金:教授的优先事项》一书中就这一主题撰写的文章试图让教师们参与到这一追求中来。一所教育学院通过教师参与专业学习社区(PLC)探索了Boyer的模式。通过一个定性的案例研究,包括对文件和教师焦点小组的回顾,研究人员研究了教师如何能够在他们的工作中注入重新考虑的博耶尔奖学金的组成部分。研究结果指出,教师对博耶尔作品的理解有所提高,但并没有导致他的想法在PLC期间被更多地纳入实践。研究人员得出结论,在PLC的领导、设计和应用方面的改进可以促进教师参与PLC,并可能导致在他们的工作中增加对Boyer作品的参与和应用。关键词:重新审视博耶奖学金,专业学习社区,高等教育
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信