Classification Comparison: Autism Spectrum Rating Scale and the ADOS-2 in an Underserved Rural Appalachian Setting

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Allison Simpson, Myra Beth Bundy, Dustin B. Wygant
{"title":"Classification Comparison: Autism Spectrum Rating Scale and the ADOS-2 in an Underserved Rural Appalachian Setting","authors":"Allison Simpson, Myra Beth Bundy, Dustin B. Wygant","doi":"10.1080/19315864.2022.2070808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction With the increasing prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in recent years, there has been a significant interest in diagnostic accuracy and patterns of autism. Behavior checklists, such as the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale (ASRS), are widely used in psychological evaluations, and while some evidence supports their use in autism assessment, there is some question about their validity, especially when compared to comprehensive measures and behavioral observations. Method The current study used ADOS-2 diagnostic classifications as a measure of “ADOS-2 ASD” and compared this classification to ASRS parent and teacher ratings, with an aim of assessing the discriminant (diagnostic) validity of the ASRS. Results Analyses indicated that parent and teacher ASRS report scores were not significantly different for individuals with and without autism as indicated by ADOS-2 classification. Conclusion Implications of this preliminary research as well as future directions are suggested, including a concern that the ASRS may not provide the specific information needed to assist clinicians in differentiating between children who do or do not meet ASD diagnostic criteria.","PeriodicalId":45864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"44 1","pages":"253 - 262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2022.2070808","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction With the increasing prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in recent years, there has been a significant interest in diagnostic accuracy and patterns of autism. Behavior checklists, such as the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale (ASRS), are widely used in psychological evaluations, and while some evidence supports their use in autism assessment, there is some question about their validity, especially when compared to comprehensive measures and behavioral observations. Method The current study used ADOS-2 diagnostic classifications as a measure of “ADOS-2 ASD” and compared this classification to ASRS parent and teacher ratings, with an aim of assessing the discriminant (diagnostic) validity of the ASRS. Results Analyses indicated that parent and teacher ASRS report scores were not significantly different for individuals with and without autism as indicated by ADOS-2 classification. Conclusion Implications of this preliminary research as well as future directions are suggested, including a concern that the ASRS may not provide the specific information needed to assist clinicians in differentiating between children who do or do not meet ASD diagnostic criteria.
分类比较:自闭症谱系评定量表与ADOS-2在阿巴拉契亚农村服务不足地区的应用
近年来,随着自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患病率的增加,人们对自闭症的诊断准确性和模式产生了极大的兴趣。行为检查表,如自闭症谱系评定量表(ASRS),被广泛用于心理评估,虽然一些证据支持它们在自闭症评估中的应用,但它们的有效性存在一些问题,特别是与综合测量和行为观察相比较时。方法本研究采用ADOS-2诊断分类作为“ADOS-2 ASD”的衡量标准,并将该分类与ASRS家长和教师评分进行比较,以评估ASRS的判别(诊断)效度。结果分析显示,有自闭症和无自闭症的家长和教师的ASRS报告得分无显著差异。结论本初步研究的意义以及未来的发展方向,包括ASRS可能不能提供帮助临床医生区分符合或不符合ASD诊断标准的儿童所需的具体信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信