H συμβολή των δυνατών σε πόλεις της Δηλιακής-Αθηναϊκής Συμμαχίας στο τῆς θαλάσσης κράτος

Anna Ramou-Hapsiadi
{"title":"H συμβολή των δυνατών σε πόλεις της Δηλιακής-Αθηναϊκής Συμμαχίας στο τῆς θαλάσσης κράτος","authors":"Anna Ramou-Hapsiadi","doi":"10.13135/2039-4985/1905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From Thucydides we assume that among Athens’ allied states the burden of providing ships or phoros fell entirely on the δυνατοί, wealthy landowners, who were either oligarchs or democrats or «potential democrats». It is worth mentioning that the arrangement concerning the poleis of Lesbos, except Methymna, after their surrender, mainly, the rental yearly paid by the farmers to the cleruchs, worked as a substitution of the phoros , divided equally to the farmers, since the δυνατοί who survived could not afford by themselves the burden of it. In other cases the land occupied by cleruchs was taken from wealthy landowners, who contributed in another way to the growth of Athenian hegemony. The power and wealth of the δ υνατοί are indicated by the role they played in the revolts, which occurred till 412, and the measures taken by Athens after recovering the revolted poleis. Oligarchs, mainly, were the instigators of the revolts, while Athens favored those friendly to her. Even when a democracy was imposed the wealthy gained effective control since a system of paying citizens for public services did not exist. It is noticeable that at Samos in 412 the demos having slew 200 and condemned to exile 400 of the δυνατοί distributed among themselves their land and houses. By so doing they secured their means of living and were able to participate in the government. After Athens’ great defeat in Sicily δυνατοί oligarchs grasped the opportunity to secede from Athens, since they believed that the Athenians would not be able to hold out through the following summer. Thus they opportunely aligned themselves with Sparta helping her to obtain the hegemony, hoping that in the near future they will without any pressure or intervention control their own affairs.","PeriodicalId":30377,"journal":{"name":"Historika Studi di Storia Greca e Romana","volume":"47 1","pages":"41-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historika Studi di Storia Greca e Romana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13135/2039-4985/1905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From Thucydides we assume that among Athens’ allied states the burden of providing ships or phoros fell entirely on the δυνατοί, wealthy landowners, who were either oligarchs or democrats or «potential democrats». It is worth mentioning that the arrangement concerning the poleis of Lesbos, except Methymna, after their surrender, mainly, the rental yearly paid by the farmers to the cleruchs, worked as a substitution of the phoros , divided equally to the farmers, since the δυνατοί who survived could not afford by themselves the burden of it. In other cases the land occupied by cleruchs was taken from wealthy landowners, who contributed in another way to the growth of Athenian hegemony. The power and wealth of the δ υνατοί are indicated by the role they played in the revolts, which occurred till 412, and the measures taken by Athens after recovering the revolted poleis. Oligarchs, mainly, were the instigators of the revolts, while Athens favored those friendly to her. Even when a democracy was imposed the wealthy gained effective control since a system of paying citizens for public services did not exist. It is noticeable that at Samos in 412 the demos having slew 200 and condemned to exile 400 of the δυνατοί distributed among themselves their land and houses. By so doing they secured their means of living and were able to participate in the government. After Athens’ great defeat in Sicily δυνατοί oligarchs grasped the opportunity to secede from Athens, since they believed that the Athenians would not be able to hold out through the following summer. Thus they opportunely aligned themselves with Sparta helping her to obtain the hegemony, hoping that in the near future they will without any pressure or intervention control their own affairs.
从修昔底德那里,我们假设,在雅典的盟国中,提供船只或船只的负担完全落在了富有的地主身上,他们要么是寡头,要么是民主主义者,要么是“潜在的民主主义者”。值得一提的是,关于莱斯博斯的城邦的安排,除了Methymna,在他们投降后,主要是由农民每年支付给神职人员的租金,作为一种替代,平均分配给农民,因为幸存下来的δ δ νατοί无法自己负担得起它的负担。在其他情况下,神职人员占领的土地是从富有的地主手中夺走的,这些地主以另一种方式促进了雅典霸权的发展。他们在直到公元412年的起义中所扮演的角色,以及雅典在收复起义城邦后所采取的措施,表明了他们的权力和财富。寡头们,主要是起义的煽动者,而雅典偏爱那些对她友好的人。即使在实行民主的时候,富人也获得了有效的控制,因为不存在向公民支付公共服务费用的制度。值得注意的是,在公元412年的萨摩斯,在杀害了200人并流放了400人之后,demos在他们之间分配了他们的土地和房屋。这样,他们就有了自己的生活资料,并能够参与政府。雅典在西西里大败之后,寡头们抓住了脱离雅典的机会,因为他们相信雅典人将无法坚持到第二年夏天。因此,他们适时地与斯巴达结盟,帮助她获得霸权,希望在不久的将来,他们可以在没有任何压力和干预的情况下控制自己的事务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信