Can involvement induced by guidance foster scientific reasoning and knowledge of participants of a citizen science project?

IF 1.4 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Alena Rögele, K. Scheiter, C. Randler
{"title":"Can involvement induced by guidance foster scientific reasoning and knowledge of participants of a citizen science project?","authors":"Alena Rögele, K. Scheiter, C. Randler","doi":"10.1080/21548455.2022.2043567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Citizen Science projects are continuously growing in popularity as they offer a unique possibility to conduct large-scale research projects as well as allow citizens to broaden their knowledge about the research topic or the process of scientific investigations. However, the benefits for participants vary, depending on the way and the amount of participants’ personal involvement in the project. In this study, we investigated whether additional guidance would improve involvement and hence lead to greater knowledge gains, higher commitment and improved scientific reasoning of participants in a Citizen Science project on birdwatching. A group receiving guidance was compared to a group which took part in the same project without receiving additional support. Results showed that both groups enhanced their knowledge about birds and their commitment to birding, while there were no significant changes in scientific reasoning. However, participants receiving additional guidance observed a higher number of different bird species and reported being able to identify significantly more species. Participation in a Citizen Science project either with or without further guidance can be seen as powerful in supporting birders at the beginning of their initial stages. Thus, both versions should be taken into account when designing future Citizen Science projects.","PeriodicalId":45375,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement","volume":"1 1","pages":"94 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2022.2043567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT Citizen Science projects are continuously growing in popularity as they offer a unique possibility to conduct large-scale research projects as well as allow citizens to broaden their knowledge about the research topic or the process of scientific investigations. However, the benefits for participants vary, depending on the way and the amount of participants’ personal involvement in the project. In this study, we investigated whether additional guidance would improve involvement and hence lead to greater knowledge gains, higher commitment and improved scientific reasoning of participants in a Citizen Science project on birdwatching. A group receiving guidance was compared to a group which took part in the same project without receiving additional support. Results showed that both groups enhanced their knowledge about birds and their commitment to birding, while there were no significant changes in scientific reasoning. However, participants receiving additional guidance observed a higher number of different bird species and reported being able to identify significantly more species. Participation in a Citizen Science project either with or without further guidance can be seen as powerful in supporting birders at the beginning of their initial stages. Thus, both versions should be taken into account when designing future Citizen Science projects.
引导诱导的参与能培养公民科学项目参与者的科学推理和知识吗?
公民科学项目越来越受欢迎,因为它们为开展大型研究项目提供了独特的可能性,并允许公民扩大他们对研究主题或科学调查过程的认识。然而,参与者的收益各不相同,这取决于参与者个人参与项目的方式和数量。在这项研究中,我们调查了额外的指导是否会提高参与,从而导致更多的知识收获,更高的承诺和改进科学推理的公民科学观鸟项目的参与者。接受指导的小组与没有接受额外支持的小组进行了比较。结果表明,两组人对鸟类的认识和观鸟的投入都有所提高,而科学推理方面没有明显变化。然而,接受额外指导的参与者观察到更多不同的鸟类物种,并报告能够识别更多的物种。参与公民科学项目,无论是否有进一步的指导,都可以被视为在最初阶段支持观鸟者的有力手段。因此,在设计未来的公民科学项目时,这两个版本都应该考虑进去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: International Journal of Science Education Part B: Communication and Public Engagement will address the communication between and the engagement by individuals and groups concerning evidence-based information about the nature, outcomes, and social consequences, of science and technology. The journal will aim: -To bridge the gap between theory and practice concerning the communication of evidence-based information about the nature, outcomes, and social consequences of science and technology; -To address the perspectives on communication about science and technology of individuals and groups of citizens of all ages, scientists and engineers, media persons, industrialists, policy makers, from countries throughout the world; -To promote rational discourse about the role of communication concerning science and technology in private, social, economic and cultural aspects of life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信