The effect of composite bonding spot size and location on the performance of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) retainer wires

A. Kadhum, Akram F. Alhuwaizi
{"title":"The effect of composite bonding spot size and location on the performance of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) retainer wires","authors":"A. Kadhum, Akram F. Alhuwaizi","doi":"10.26477/JBCD.V33I2.2932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Poly-ether-ether-ketone(PEEK) has been introduced to many dental fields. Recently it was tested as a retainer wire‎ following orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to investigate the effect of changing the bonding spot size and location on the performance of PEEK retainer wires. Methods: A biomechanical study involving four three-dimensional finite element models was performed. The basic model was with a 0.8 mm cylindrical cross-section PEEK wire, bonded at the center of the lingual surface of the mandibular incisors with 4 mm in diameter composite spots. Two other models were designed with 3 mm and 5 mm composite sizes. The last model was created with the composite bonding spot of the canine away from the center of the crown, closer to the lateral incisor. The linear displacement of the teeth, strains of the periodontal ligament, and stresses in PEEK wire and composite were evaluated. The data was numerically produced with color coded display by the software. Selected values were tabulated and compared among models. Results: The amount of linear displacement and strain was very low. Stresses in the wire and composite were affected by the size and position of the composite bonding spot. The safe limits were identified at 235 MPa for PEEK and 100 MPa for composite. The basic model had a von Mises stress in the PEEK wire of 122.09 MPa, and a maximum principal stress in the composite of 99.779 MPa. Both stresses were within the safe limits, which means a lower risk of failure in PEEK and composite. All other models had stresses that exceeded the safe limit of the composite. The 3 mm composite model was the only one that developed stresses in the wire more than the safe limits of PEEK. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, bonding PEEK wires with 4 mm bonding spots to the clinical crown center provided the best mechanical performance of the wires and spots; otherwise, the mechanical properties of the wire and composite would be affected and, therefore, might affect the retention process. Keywords: Retention, PEEK, Finite element analysis","PeriodicalId":15041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of baghdad college of dentistry","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of baghdad college of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26477/JBCD.V33I2.2932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Poly-ether-ether-ketone(PEEK) has been introduced to many dental fields. Recently it was tested as a retainer wire‎ following orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to investigate the effect of changing the bonding spot size and location on the performance of PEEK retainer wires. Methods: A biomechanical study involving four three-dimensional finite element models was performed. The basic model was with a 0.8 mm cylindrical cross-section PEEK wire, bonded at the center of the lingual surface of the mandibular incisors with 4 mm in diameter composite spots. Two other models were designed with 3 mm and 5 mm composite sizes. The last model was created with the composite bonding spot of the canine away from the center of the crown, closer to the lateral incisor. The linear displacement of the teeth, strains of the periodontal ligament, and stresses in PEEK wire and composite were evaluated. The data was numerically produced with color coded display by the software. Selected values were tabulated and compared among models. Results: The amount of linear displacement and strain was very low. Stresses in the wire and composite were affected by the size and position of the composite bonding spot. The safe limits were identified at 235 MPa for PEEK and 100 MPa for composite. The basic model had a von Mises stress in the PEEK wire of 122.09 MPa, and a maximum principal stress in the composite of 99.779 MPa. Both stresses were within the safe limits, which means a lower risk of failure in PEEK and composite. All other models had stresses that exceeded the safe limit of the composite. The 3 mm composite model was the only one that developed stresses in the wire more than the safe limits of PEEK. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, bonding PEEK wires with 4 mm bonding spots to the clinical crown center provided the best mechanical performance of the wires and spots; otherwise, the mechanical properties of the wire and composite would be affected and, therefore, might affect the retention process. Keywords: Retention, PEEK, Finite element analysis
复合键合点尺寸和位置对聚醚-醚-酮(PEEK)保持丝性能的影响
背景:聚醚醚酮(PEEK)已被引入到许多牙科领域。最近,它被测试为正畸治疗后的固位金属丝。本研究的目的是探讨改变粘合点的大小和位置对PEEK保持器丝性能的影响。方法:采用四种三维有限元模型进行生物力学研究。基本模型采用0.8 mm圆柱截面PEEK金属丝,在下颌切牙舌面中心粘接直径为4mm的复合点。另外两种模型设计了3毫米和5毫米的复合材料尺寸。最后一个模型是用复合粘接点的犬齿远离冠的中心,更接近侧门牙。评估了牙的线性位移、牙周韧带的应变以及PEEK金属丝和复合材料的应力。数据由软件以数字方式生成,并以彩色编码显示。将选择的值制成表格,并在模型之间进行比较。结果:线位移和应变量很小。焊丝和复合材料中的应力受复合材料结合点的大小和位置的影响。PEEK的安全限值为235 MPa,复合材料的安全限值为100 MPa。在基本模型中,PEEK线材的von Mises应力为122.09 MPa,复合材料的最大主应力为99.779 MPa。这两个应力都在安全范围内,这意味着PEEK和复合材料的失效风险较低。所有其他型号的应力都超过了复合材料的安全极限。3mm的复合模型是唯一一种在线材中产生应力超过PEEK安全极限的模型。结论:在本研究的限制范围内,采用4 mm粘接点与临床冠中心粘接PEEK金属丝可提供最佳的金属丝和金属点力学性能;否则,线材和复合材料的力学性能将受到影响,因此,可能会影响保持过程。关键词:滞留,PEEK,有限元分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书