Canal wall down mastoidectomy with obliteration versus canal wall up mastoidectomy in primary cholesteatoma surgery.

M. Wilkie, D. Chudek, Christopher J. Webb, Alessandro Panarese, G. Bánhegyi
{"title":"Canal wall down mastoidectomy with obliteration versus canal wall up mastoidectomy in primary cholesteatoma surgery.","authors":"M. Wilkie, D. Chudek, Christopher J. Webb, Alessandro Panarese, G. Bánhegyi","doi":"10.1017/S0022215119002408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nThis study sought to compare disease recidivism rates between canal wall up mastoidectomy and a canal wall down with obliteration technique.\n\n\nMETHODS\nPatients undergoing primary cholesteatoma surgery at our institution over a five-year period (2013-2017) using the aforementioned techniques were eligible for inclusion in the study. Rates of discharge and disease recidivism were analysed using chi-square statistics.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 104 ears (98 patients) were included. The mean follow-up period was 30 months (range, 12-52 months). A canal wall down with mastoid obliteration technique was performed in 55 cases and a canal wall up approach was performed in 49 cases. Disease recidivism rates were 7.3 per cent and 16.3 per cent in the canal wall down with mastoid obliteration and canal wall up groups respectively (p = 0.02), whilst discharge rates were similar (7.3 per cent and 10.2 per cent respectively).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nOur direct comparative data suggest that canal wall down mastoidectomy with obliteration is superior to a canal wall up technique in primary cholesteatoma surgery, providing a lower recidivism rate combined with a low post-operative ear discharge rate.","PeriodicalId":76651,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215119002408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

OBJECTIVE This study sought to compare disease recidivism rates between canal wall up mastoidectomy and a canal wall down with obliteration technique. METHODS Patients undergoing primary cholesteatoma surgery at our institution over a five-year period (2013-2017) using the aforementioned techniques were eligible for inclusion in the study. Rates of discharge and disease recidivism were analysed using chi-square statistics. RESULTS A total of 104 ears (98 patients) were included. The mean follow-up period was 30 months (range, 12-52 months). A canal wall down with mastoid obliteration technique was performed in 55 cases and a canal wall up approach was performed in 49 cases. Disease recidivism rates were 7.3 per cent and 16.3 per cent in the canal wall down with mastoid obliteration and canal wall up groups respectively (p = 0.02), whilst discharge rates were similar (7.3 per cent and 10.2 per cent respectively). CONCLUSION Our direct comparative data suggest that canal wall down mastoidectomy with obliteration is superior to a canal wall up technique in primary cholesteatoma surgery, providing a lower recidivism rate combined with a low post-operative ear discharge rate.
原发性胆脂瘤手术中管壁下乳突切除术与管壁上乳突切除术的比较。
目的比较乳突管壁上切术与管壁下切术的疾病再犯率。方法5年内(2013-2017年)在我院使用上述技术进行原发性胆脂瘤手术的患者符合纳入研究的条件。出院率和疾病再犯率采用卡方统计分析。结果共纳入104耳(98例)。平均随访时间30个月(范围12-52个月)。采用乳突封堵技术下入管壁55例,上入管壁49例。乳突闭塞管壁下组和管壁上组的疾病再犯率分别为7.3%和16.3% (p = 0.02),而出院率相似(分别为7.3%和10.2%)。结论:我们的直接比较数据表明,在原发性胆脂瘤手术中,乳突管壁下切术联合封堵术优于管壁上切术,具有较低的再犯率和较低的术后耳排出率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书