Post-Issue of Sustainability Report: Does Market Valuation Improve?

Nurmadi Harsa Sumarta, Prihatnolo Gandhi Amidjaya, M. Prabowo, T. Mulyaningsih
{"title":"Post-Issue of Sustainability Report: Does Market Valuation Improve?","authors":"Nurmadi Harsa Sumarta, Prihatnolo Gandhi Amidjaya, M. Prabowo, T. Mulyaningsih","doi":"10.47836/ijeam.17.1.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the increased concern on sustainability reporting in Indonesia, this study\nattempts to investigate whether the issuance of sustainability report is able to provide\npositive impact on bank reputation and market valuation. We use a set of unbalanced\npanel data that consist of 43 Indonesian listed banks throughout 2010-2018 while our\nanalysis is performed with panel data regression using STATA statistics software. Overall, the findings demonstrate that environmental disclosure provides positive impact on market valuation while economic and social disclosure do not. We also find the mediating role of bank reputation between the link of environmental disclosure and market valuation. By splitting the observation period into pre and post sustainable finance roadmap implementation, we find that economic disclosure holds significant contribution to increasing market valuation in the period before sustainable finance roadmap implementation while social and environmental disclosure demonstrate positive effect in the period when sustainable finance roadmap is implemented. This study, however, still contains limitation due to the use of content analysis in assessing sustainability report quality that may contain subjectivity issue. Further studies can obtain external assurance from independent experts in this subject. The use of quantitative-qualitative mixed method may also be a solution to solve this issue. This study provides several implications. Firstly, this study supports the regulation from the Indonesia Financial Service Authority to increase the participation of Indonesian banks in sustainability reporting in which the implementation must be followed with high regulation enforcement. We also suggest the practice of sustainability reporting for Indonesian listed banks as it gives considerable benefit in higher market valuation. This research addresses the gap in Indonesian literature that is limited on determinant study by providing more insights on how sustainability reporting provides on higher bank reputation and market valuation.","PeriodicalId":40031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economics and Management","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47836/ijeam.17.1.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Following the increased concern on sustainability reporting in Indonesia, this study attempts to investigate whether the issuance of sustainability report is able to provide positive impact on bank reputation and market valuation. We use a set of unbalanced panel data that consist of 43 Indonesian listed banks throughout 2010-2018 while our analysis is performed with panel data regression using STATA statistics software. Overall, the findings demonstrate that environmental disclosure provides positive impact on market valuation while economic and social disclosure do not. We also find the mediating role of bank reputation between the link of environmental disclosure and market valuation. By splitting the observation period into pre and post sustainable finance roadmap implementation, we find that economic disclosure holds significant contribution to increasing market valuation in the period before sustainable finance roadmap implementation while social and environmental disclosure demonstrate positive effect in the period when sustainable finance roadmap is implemented. This study, however, still contains limitation due to the use of content analysis in assessing sustainability report quality that may contain subjectivity issue. Further studies can obtain external assurance from independent experts in this subject. The use of quantitative-qualitative mixed method may also be a solution to solve this issue. This study provides several implications. Firstly, this study supports the regulation from the Indonesia Financial Service Authority to increase the participation of Indonesian banks in sustainability reporting in which the implementation must be followed with high regulation enforcement. We also suggest the practice of sustainability reporting for Indonesian listed banks as it gives considerable benefit in higher market valuation. This research addresses the gap in Indonesian literature that is limited on determinant study by providing more insights on how sustainability reporting provides on higher bank reputation and market valuation.
可持续发展报告发布后:市场估值是否有所改善?
随着印度尼西亚对可持续发展报告的关注日益增加,本研究试图调查可持续发展报告的发布是否能够对银行声誉和市场估值产生积极影响。我们使用了一组2010-2018年期间由43家印尼上市银行组成的不平衡面板数据,而我们的分析是使用STATA统计软件进行面板数据回归的。总体而言,研究结果表明,环境信息披露对市场估值有正向影响,而经济和社会信息披露对市场估值没有正向影响。我们还发现了银行声誉在环境披露与市场估值之间的中介作用。通过将观察期划分为可持续金融路线图实施前和实施后,我们发现经济披露在可持续金融路线图实施前对市场估值的提升有显著贡献,而社会和环境披露在可持续金融路线图实施后对市场估值的提升有显著贡献。然而,本研究仍然存在局限性,因为在评估可持续发展报告质量时使用的内容分析可能包含主观性问题。进一步的研究可以从这方面的独立专家那里获得外部保证。采用定量-定性混合方法也可能是解决这一问题的一种方法。这项研究提供了几点启示。首先,本研究支持印尼金融服务管理局的监管,以增加印尼银行参与可持续发展报告,其中实施必须遵循高监管执法。我们还建议印尼上市银行实行可持续发展报告,因为它对更高的市场估值有相当大的好处。本研究通过提供更多关于可持续发展报告如何提供更高的银行声誉和市场估值的见解,解决了印度尼西亚文献中局限于决定性研究的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Economics and Management
International Journal of Economics and Management Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal focuses on economics and management issues. The main subjects for economics cover national macroeconomic issues, international economic issues, interactions of national and regional economies, microeconomics and macroeconomics policies. The journal also considers thought-leading substantive research in the finance discipline. The main subjects for management include management decisions, Small Medium Enterprises (SME) practices, corporate social policies, digital marketing strategies and strategic management. The journal emphasises empirical studies with practical applications; examinations of theoretical and methodological developments. The journal is committed to publishing the high quality articles from economics and management perspectives. It is a triannual journal published in April, August and December and all articles submitted are in English. IJEM follows a double-blind peer-review process, whereby authors do not know reviewers and vice versa. Peer review is fundamental to the scientific publication process and the dissemination of sound science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信