Heritage: The Music of Madrid in the Time of Goya Luigi Boccherini (1743–1805), Gaetano Brunetti (1744–1798), Manuel Canales (1747–1786), João Pedro de Almeida Mota (1744–c1817), Cristóbal de Morales (1500–1553) Cuarteto Quiroga Cobra 0067, 2019; one disc, 80 minutes

IF 0.1 2区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
W. Thormählen
{"title":"Heritage: The Music of Madrid in the Time of Goya Luigi Boccherini (1743–1805), Gaetano Brunetti (1744–1798), Manuel Canales (1747–1786), João Pedro de Almeida Mota (1744–c1817), Cristóbal de Morales (1500–1553) Cuarteto Quiroga Cobra 0067, 2019; one disc, 80 minutes","authors":"W. Thormählen","doi":"10.1017/s1478570621000245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Heritage: The Music of Madrid in the Time of Goya promises to contribute to a revisionist history that has been constructed through both scholarship and performance over at least the last twenty years. It nestles amongst writings and performances that expand our knowledge of chamber-music compositions celebrated during the late eighteenth century, illuminating their social significance and their status within an Enlightenment discourse that stretched between a new European intellectual cosmopolitanism and an increasingly expansionist nationalism. Cuarteto Quiroga present one string quartet by each of four composers active at Spanish courts between the mid-1770s and the early 1800s. Luigi Boccherini’s inclusion at the beginning of the disc allows for its immediate contextualization – his name being better known than those of Gaetano Brunetti (1744–1798), Manuel Canales (1747–1786) and João Pedro de Almeida Mota (1744–1817). The processes of recovering, editing, selecting and performing unknown works such as these usually stem from a solid collaboration between performer and researcher, here between the Cuarteto Quiroga and the musicologist Miguel Ángel Marín, as explained in the beautifully produced accompanying CD booklet. The group’s biography, as presented here, might have benefited from a little more focus on their expertise in eighteenth-century repertory and their credentials to perform on historically set-up instruments. Instead, the listener gets a long list of general stringquartet accolades that filled me, at least, with little hope for a gutsy performance that maximizes the unique qualities of both the differently tensioned strings and the pre-Tourte bow. The introduction to the group rather suggests that its members subscribe to a timeless ideal of the string quartet and its performance which much recent scholarship has tried to unpick. While pleasant to listen to, the performances of these works indeed fail to do full justice to the promise of historical revisionism: while the sleeve notes by Marín explicitly lament the loss of the Spanish ‘poetic sensibilities that were (in Boccherini and Brunetti) very personal’ and the prominence of ‘the Austro-Germanic world’ in our historical understanding of the string quartet, the performance style remains true to those ideals of beauty of tone and equilibrium of voices that were posthumously celebrated in the quartets of Haydn and Mozart – in the process of the Austro-German elevation of the genre – but that were arguably never central to either their performance or their composition. The quartets recorded here are nicely varied. To start with, the works by Boccherini and Brunetti follow the three-movement form more common in Italian works, while those by Canales and Almeida Mota each finish with a rousing fourth-movement finale, suggesting a Viennese influence. This may reflect the composers’ backgrounds: both Boccherini and Brunetti arrived in Spain young but with exposure to Italian training. Indeed, Brunetti’s work, the Quartet in B flat major L185,","PeriodicalId":11521,"journal":{"name":"Eighteenth Century Music","volume":"46 1","pages":"79 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eighteenth Century Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1478570621000245","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heritage: The Music of Madrid in the Time of Goya promises to contribute to a revisionist history that has been constructed through both scholarship and performance over at least the last twenty years. It nestles amongst writings and performances that expand our knowledge of chamber-music compositions celebrated during the late eighteenth century, illuminating their social significance and their status within an Enlightenment discourse that stretched between a new European intellectual cosmopolitanism and an increasingly expansionist nationalism. Cuarteto Quiroga present one string quartet by each of four composers active at Spanish courts between the mid-1770s and the early 1800s. Luigi Boccherini’s inclusion at the beginning of the disc allows for its immediate contextualization – his name being better known than those of Gaetano Brunetti (1744–1798), Manuel Canales (1747–1786) and João Pedro de Almeida Mota (1744–1817). The processes of recovering, editing, selecting and performing unknown works such as these usually stem from a solid collaboration between performer and researcher, here between the Cuarteto Quiroga and the musicologist Miguel Ángel Marín, as explained in the beautifully produced accompanying CD booklet. The group’s biography, as presented here, might have benefited from a little more focus on their expertise in eighteenth-century repertory and their credentials to perform on historically set-up instruments. Instead, the listener gets a long list of general stringquartet accolades that filled me, at least, with little hope for a gutsy performance that maximizes the unique qualities of both the differently tensioned strings and the pre-Tourte bow. The introduction to the group rather suggests that its members subscribe to a timeless ideal of the string quartet and its performance which much recent scholarship has tried to unpick. While pleasant to listen to, the performances of these works indeed fail to do full justice to the promise of historical revisionism: while the sleeve notes by Marín explicitly lament the loss of the Spanish ‘poetic sensibilities that were (in Boccherini and Brunetti) very personal’ and the prominence of ‘the Austro-Germanic world’ in our historical understanding of the string quartet, the performance style remains true to those ideals of beauty of tone and equilibrium of voices that were posthumously celebrated in the quartets of Haydn and Mozart – in the process of the Austro-German elevation of the genre – but that were arguably never central to either their performance or their composition. The quartets recorded here are nicely varied. To start with, the works by Boccherini and Brunetti follow the three-movement form more common in Italian works, while those by Canales and Almeida Mota each finish with a rousing fourth-movement finale, suggesting a Viennese influence. This may reflect the composers’ backgrounds: both Boccherini and Brunetti arrived in Spain young but with exposure to Italian training. Indeed, Brunetti’s work, the Quartet in B flat major L185,
《遗产:戈雅时代的马德里音乐》承诺为至少在过去二十年中通过学术和表演构建的修正主义历史做出贡献。它坐落在著作和表演中,扩展了我们对18世纪晚期著名室内乐作品的了解,阐明了它们的社会意义和它们在启蒙话语中的地位,这种话语在新欧洲知识分子的世界主义和日益扩张的民族主义之间延伸。quarteto Quiroga展示了1770年代中期到1800年代早期活跃在西班牙宫廷的四位作曲家的一首弦乐四重奏。路易吉·波切里尼的名字出现在碟片的开头,这使得他的名字可以立即被置于背景中——他的名字比盖塔诺·布鲁内蒂(1744-1798)、曼努埃尔·卡纳莱斯(1747-1786)和jo奥·佩德罗·德·阿尔梅达·莫塔(1744-1817)更为人所知。恢复,编辑,选择和表演这些未知作品的过程通常源于表演者和研究人员之间的坚实合作,这里是quarteto Quiroga和音乐学家Miguel Ángel Marín之间的合作,正如制作精美的附带CD小册子中所解释的那样。正如这里所展示的,这个乐队的传记可能会受益于更多地关注他们在18世纪的剧目方面的专业知识,以及他们在演奏历史悠久的乐器方面的资历。相反,听众得到的是一长串普通弦乐四重奏的赞美,这至少让我对大胆的演奏没有什么希望,因为它能最大限度地发挥不同张力的弦和前图尔特弓的独特品质。对该团体的介绍表明,其成员赞同弦乐四重奏及其表演的永恒理想,这是最近许多学者试图拆解的。虽然听起来很好听,但这些作品的表演确实没有充分体现历史修正主义的承诺:虽然Marín的袖口注释明确地哀叹西班牙人“(在波切里尼和布鲁内蒂身上)非常个人化的诗意情感”的丧失,以及我们对弦乐四重奏的历史理解中“奥日耳曼世界”的突出地位,演奏风格仍然忠于那些在海顿和莫扎特死后的四重奏中所推崇的音调之美和声音平衡的理想——在奥德对这一流派的提升过程中——但可以说,这从来都不是他们演奏或创作的核心。这里录制的四重奏变化很好。首先,波切里尼和布鲁内蒂的作品遵循意大利作品中更常见的三乐章形式,而卡纳莱斯和阿尔梅达莫塔的作品则以激动人心的第四乐章结束,这表明维也纳的影响。这可能反映了两位作曲家的背景:波切里尼和布鲁内蒂都是年轻时来到西班牙的,但都接受过意大利的训练。事实上,布鲁内蒂的作品,降B大调四重奏L185,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信