Whose Signals Are Being Amplified? Toward a More Equitable Clinical Psychophysiology.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Clinical Psychological Science Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-14 DOI:10.1177/21677026221112117
Daniel E Bradford, Angelica DeFalco, Emily R Perkins, Iván Carbajal, Jasmine Kwasa, Fallon R Goodman, Felicia Jackson, Lietsel N S Richardson, Nina Woodley, Lindsay Neuberger, Jennifer A Sandoval, Helen J Huang, Keanan J Joyner
{"title":"Whose Signals Are Being Amplified? Toward a More Equitable Clinical Psychophysiology.","authors":"Daniel E Bradford, Angelica DeFalco, Emily R Perkins, Iván Carbajal, Jasmine Kwasa, Fallon R Goodman, Felicia Jackson, Lietsel N S Richardson, Nina Woodley, Lindsay Neuberger, Jennifer A Sandoval, Helen J Huang, Keanan J Joyner","doi":"10.1177/21677026221112117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research using psychophysiological methods holds great promise for refining clinical assessment, identifying risk factors, and informing treatment. Unfortunately, unique methodological features of existing approaches limit inclusive research participation and, consequently, generalizability. This brief overview and commentary provides a snapshot of the current state of representation in clinical psychophysiology, with a focus on the forms and consequences of ongoing exclusion of Black participants. We illustrate issues of inequity and exclusion that are unique to clinical psychophysiology, considering intersections among social constructions of Blackness and biased design of current technology used to measure electroencephalography, skin conductance, and other signals. We then highlight work by groups dedicated to quantifying and addressing these limitations. We discuss the need for reflection and input from a wider variety of stakeholders to develop and refine new technologies, given the risk of further widening disparities. Finally, we provide broad recommendations for clinical psychophysiology research.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11028731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026221112117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research using psychophysiological methods holds great promise for refining clinical assessment, identifying risk factors, and informing treatment. Unfortunately, unique methodological features of existing approaches limit inclusive research participation and, consequently, generalizability. This brief overview and commentary provides a snapshot of the current state of representation in clinical psychophysiology, with a focus on the forms and consequences of ongoing exclusion of Black participants. We illustrate issues of inequity and exclusion that are unique to clinical psychophysiology, considering intersections among social constructions of Blackness and biased design of current technology used to measure electroencephalography, skin conductance, and other signals. We then highlight work by groups dedicated to quantifying and addressing these limitations. We discuss the need for reflection and input from a wider variety of stakeholders to develop and refine new technologies, given the risk of further widening disparities. Finally, we provide broad recommendations for clinical psychophysiology research.

谁的信号被放大?迈向更公平的临床心理生理学》。
使用心理生理学方法进行的研究在完善临床评估、确定风险因素和提供治疗信息方面大有可为。遗憾的是,现有方法的独特性限制了包容性研究的参与,进而限制了研究的普遍性。这篇简短的概述和评论简要介绍了临床心理生理学的代表性现状,重点关注目前排斥黑人参与者的形式和后果。我们阐述了临床心理生理学所特有的不公平和排斥问题,考虑了黑人的社会建构与当前用于测量脑电图、皮肤电导和其他信号的技术的偏差设计之间的交叉。然后,我们重点介绍了致力于量化和解决这些局限性的团体所做的工作。考虑到进一步扩大差异的风险,我们讨论了在开发和完善新技术时需要更广泛的利益相关者的反思和投入。最后,我们为临床心理生理学研究提出了广泛的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychological Science
Clinical Psychological Science Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Association for Psychological Science’s journal, Clinical Psychological Science, emerges from this confluence to provide readers with the best, most innovative research in clinical psychological science, giving researchers of all stripes a home for their work and a place in which to communicate with a broad audience of both clinical and other scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信