The teaching of fights in school physical education: A state of knowledge of Brazilian studies

Carla Ferreira, Nicole Cardoso, Tiele Neto Cardoso, Flávio Py Mariante Neto, D. G. Vasques
{"title":"The teaching of fights in school physical education: A state of knowledge of Brazilian studies","authors":"Carla Ferreira, Nicole Cardoso, Tiele Neto Cardoso, Flávio Py Mariante Neto, D. G. Vasques","doi":"10.4025/jphyseduc.v34i1.3417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to analyze the Brazilian academic publications on fights and Physical Education. We used content analysis through a state of knowledge, with 38 articles as corpus. As results we built four empirical analytical categories: 1) Space and sociocultural aspects: they point the lack of infrastructure and the scarcity of materials as restrictive factors for the approach of the fight contents in schools; 2) Technologies/media: that serve as auxiliary tools for the inclusion of fights in school Physical Education; 3) Physical Education curriculum: addresses issues related to content, culture, documents and teachers; and 4) Pedagogical practice: which involves more specific issues observed in the studies, such as methodologies involving the application of the content to classes, experiences, dimensions of the content, activities and implications about the themes discussed in the content, such as the association with violence, gender discrimination and sexuality. We conclude that the studies show that the approach of fights as content in schools is still incipient, being the insecurity of the teacher a preponderant factor so that fights are not inserted. Thus, studies indicate the need to create materials and methodologies that help teachers, thus enabling the use of content already consolidated in the literature.","PeriodicalId":16809,"journal":{"name":"journal of physical education","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"journal of physical education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/jphyseduc.v34i1.3417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the Brazilian academic publications on fights and Physical Education. We used content analysis through a state of knowledge, with 38 articles as corpus. As results we built four empirical analytical categories: 1) Space and sociocultural aspects: they point the lack of infrastructure and the scarcity of materials as restrictive factors for the approach of the fight contents in schools; 2) Technologies/media: that serve as auxiliary tools for the inclusion of fights in school Physical Education; 3) Physical Education curriculum: addresses issues related to content, culture, documents and teachers; and 4) Pedagogical practice: which involves more specific issues observed in the studies, such as methodologies involving the application of the content to classes, experiences, dimensions of the content, activities and implications about the themes discussed in the content, such as the association with violence, gender discrimination and sexuality. We conclude that the studies show that the approach of fights as content in schools is still incipient, being the insecurity of the teacher a preponderant factor so that fights are not inserted. Thus, studies indicate the need to create materials and methodologies that help teachers, thus enabling the use of content already consolidated in the literature.
学校体育教学中的格斗教学:巴西研究的知识现状
本文旨在分析巴西关于格斗和体育的学术出版物。我们通过知识状态进行内容分析,以38篇文章作为语料库。结果,我们建立了四个实证分析类别:1)空间和社会文化方面:他们指出基础设施的缺乏和材料的稀缺性是学校战斗内容方法的限制因素;2)技术/媒体:在学校体育教学中纳入格斗的辅助工具;3)体育课程:解决内容、文化、文献、教师等问题;4)教学实践:涉及研究中观察到的更具体的问题,例如涉及将内容应用于课堂的方法、经验、内容的维度、活动和内容中讨论的主题的含义,例如与暴力、性别歧视和性行为的关联。我们的结论是,这些研究表明,在学校中,打架作为内容的方法仍处于起步阶段,教师的不安全感是一个主要因素,因此打架没有被插入。因此,研究表明需要创造帮助教师的材料和方法,从而能够使用文献中已经巩固的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信