{"title":"Ideology, metaphor and persuasion in times of elections: a corpus-based study of British and Spanish economic reports","authors":"M. M. Gil","doi":"10.5209/cjes.63865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metaphor has been studied as a pervasive and intrinsic discourse tool over the last decades in many different types of discourse (Lakoff and Johnson 1980, Semino 2008, Kövecses 2010, etc.). Considering the strong effect it has on the discourse participants and how it can persuade them towards one side, action, or thought (Charteris-Black 2004, Silaski 2012), it is necessary to study it when the timeframe and the discourse where it is used are ideologically loaded. Based on recent studies on metaphor in economics (Alejo 2010, Herrera-Soler and White 2012, Soares da Silva et al. 2017), metaphor in the press (Koller 2004/2008) and metaphor and ideology (Goatly 2007, Silaski 2012), this article presents a corpus-based study of metaphor in reports of economic affairs in the English and Spanish press during the pre-election week of 2015. The corpus (about 160,000 words) consists of reports published by six newspapers that support different political spheres (left, centre and right): The Guardian, The Independent and The Telegraph in English, and Público, El País and ABC in Spanish. From a Critical Metaphor Analysis perspective (Charteris-Black 2004), the study starts from the hypothesis that the political stand of each newspaper might condition the metaphors. Indeed, metaphors pointing at certain side of political spheres appear in all the sub-corpora of the study, but in distinctive ways, as will be shown. In any case, critical factors such as cognitive and cultural reasons beyond the political stand of the media in question need to be acknowledged as well, which conveys further and more comprehensive analyses.","PeriodicalId":40655,"journal":{"name":"Complutense Journal of English Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complutense Journal of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/cjes.63865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Metaphor has been studied as a pervasive and intrinsic discourse tool over the last decades in many different types of discourse (Lakoff and Johnson 1980, Semino 2008, Kövecses 2010, etc.). Considering the strong effect it has on the discourse participants and how it can persuade them towards one side, action, or thought (Charteris-Black 2004, Silaski 2012), it is necessary to study it when the timeframe and the discourse where it is used are ideologically loaded. Based on recent studies on metaphor in economics (Alejo 2010, Herrera-Soler and White 2012, Soares da Silva et al. 2017), metaphor in the press (Koller 2004/2008) and metaphor and ideology (Goatly 2007, Silaski 2012), this article presents a corpus-based study of metaphor in reports of economic affairs in the English and Spanish press during the pre-election week of 2015. The corpus (about 160,000 words) consists of reports published by six newspapers that support different political spheres (left, centre and right): The Guardian, The Independent and The Telegraph in English, and Público, El País and ABC in Spanish. From a Critical Metaphor Analysis perspective (Charteris-Black 2004), the study starts from the hypothesis that the political stand of each newspaper might condition the metaphors. Indeed, metaphors pointing at certain side of political spheres appear in all the sub-corpora of the study, but in distinctive ways, as will be shown. In any case, critical factors such as cognitive and cultural reasons beyond the political stand of the media in question need to be acknowledged as well, which conveys further and more comprehensive analyses.
在过去的几十年里,隐喻作为一种普遍存在的内在话语工具在许多不同类型的话语中被研究(Lakoff and Johnson 1980, Semino 2008, Kövecses 2010等)。考虑到它对话语参与者的强烈影响,以及它如何说服他们走向一方、行动或思想(Charteris-Black 2004, Silaski 2012),当使用它的时间框架和话语被意识形态负载时,有必要对它进行研究。基于最近对经济学隐喻的研究(Alejo 2010, Herrera-Soler and White 2012, Soares da Silva et al. 2017),媒体隐喻(Koller 2004/2008)和隐喻与意识形态(Goatly 2007, Silaski 2012),本文在2015年大选前一周对英语和西班牙媒体经济事务报道中的隐喻进行了基于语料库的研究。语料库(约16万字)由支持不同政治领域(左、中、右)的六家报纸发表的报道组成:英语的《卫报》、《独立报》和《每日电讯报》,以及西班牙语的Público、El País和ABC。从批判性隐喻分析的角度(Charteris-Black 2004),研究从假设开始,即每家报纸的政治立场可能会制约隐喻。事实上,指向政治领域某些方面的隐喻出现在本研究的所有子语料库中,但方式不同,如下所示。无论如何,也需要承认媒体政治立场之外的认知和文化原因等关键因素,从而进行进一步和更全面的分析。