Lazaretto Ambiguity in the Early Nineteenth-Century Mediterranean

IF 0.6 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Alex Chase-Levenson
{"title":"Lazaretto Ambiguity in the Early Nineteenth-Century Mediterranean","authors":"Alex Chase-Levenson","doi":"10.1353/cot.2022.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article considers the ambiguity surrounding the lazarettos status as institutions of Mediterranean port cities by examining the contradiction between their vital economic role, the numerous regulations that proscribed access to these institutions, and the novel ways they were governed. The argumentative spine will be a comparison of the contrasting trajectories of the lazarettos of Marseille and Malta. The former complex was known as the preeminent institution in the Mediterranean as the nineteenth century began, yet the Marseille Board of Health resolutely sought to retain its traditional Independence from France's central government. The sprawling building complex itself (the Lazaret d'Arenc) was long ago dismantled. The Lazaretto of Malta took over as the busiest quarantine station in the Mediterranean by the 1830s, and it was always governed with more flexibility. This complex has survived and is the subject of a modern restoration effort. This article considers the way in which early nineteenth century histories of administration, demarcation, and proscription of access played a role in the long-term fate of both institutions after universal, mandatory quarantine broke down in the 1850s.","PeriodicalId":51982,"journal":{"name":"Change Over Time-An International Journal of Conservation and the Built Environment","volume":"57 1","pages":"36 - 56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Change Over Time-An International Journal of Conservation and the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cot.2022.0014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article considers the ambiguity surrounding the lazarettos status as institutions of Mediterranean port cities by examining the contradiction between their vital economic role, the numerous regulations that proscribed access to these institutions, and the novel ways they were governed. The argumentative spine will be a comparison of the contrasting trajectories of the lazarettos of Marseille and Malta. The former complex was known as the preeminent institution in the Mediterranean as the nineteenth century began, yet the Marseille Board of Health resolutely sought to retain its traditional Independence from France's central government. The sprawling building complex itself (the Lazaret d'Arenc) was long ago dismantled. The Lazaretto of Malta took over as the busiest quarantine station in the Mediterranean by the 1830s, and it was always governed with more flexibility. This complex has survived and is the subject of a modern restoration effort. This article considers the way in which early nineteenth century histories of administration, demarcation, and proscription of access played a role in the long-term fate of both institutions after universal, mandatory quarantine broke down in the 1850s.
十九世纪早期地中海的拉扎雷托歧义
摘要:本文通过考察其重要的经济作用、禁止进入这些机构的众多法规以及管理这些机构的新方式之间的矛盾,考虑了围绕着这些机构作为地中海港口城市机构地位的模糊性。争论的焦点将是马赛和马耳他检疫站的对比轨迹的比较。在19世纪初,这座建筑群被认为是地中海地区最杰出的机构,但马赛卫生局坚决寻求保持其独立于法国中央政府的传统。这座庞大的建筑群本身(拉撒勒德arenc)早就被拆除了。到19世纪30年代,马耳他的拉扎雷托(Lazaretto)成为地中海最繁忙的检疫站,它的管理总是更加灵活。这个建筑群保存了下来,正在进行现代修复工作。这篇文章考虑了19世纪早期的管理,划分和禁止进入的历史在19世纪50年代普遍强制性隔离崩溃后对这两个机构的长期命运所起的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Change Over Time is a semiannual journal publishing original, peer-reviewed research papers and review articles on the history, theory, and praxis of conservation and the built environment. Each issue is dedicated to a particular theme as a method to promote critical discourse on contemporary conservation issues from multiple perspectives both within the field and across disciplines. Themes will be examined at all scales, from the global and regional to the microscopic and material. Past issues have addressed topics such as repair, adaptation, nostalgia, and interpretation and display.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信