Anaesthesia Challenges in Patients with Bear Bite

Jyoti M. Naitam, Pooja Mamtani
{"title":"Anaesthesia Challenges in Patients with Bear Bite","authors":"Jyoti M. Naitam, Pooja Mamtani","doi":"10.7439/IJBR.V8I12.4530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: Patients injured in bear attack present with different patterns of injuries. A common protocol may not be suitable for the management of injuries inflicted by these large wild animals. Anaesthetic management of such injuries often need multidisciplinary approach. Here, we reported case series of anaesthesia challenges in Bear bite patients who were brought to Govt. Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur; and were managed in emergency situations for surgery under anaesthesia. Method: This retrospective observational study was conducted on total 10 cases of either sex, having age ranging from 30-50 years, over a period of two years. The data was collected from case records and analyzed accordingly. Results: Due to injury over face and oedema, there was problem of ventilation with Ambu Bag as far as casualty management was concerned. It was difficult to hold the anaesthesia circuit mask while preoxygenation before induction and intubation. Also we faced difficulty in laryngoscopy and Intubation due to distorted anatomy of face and oedema. In few cases, Bear bite injury was noted on limb, chest and abdomen. Some of patients were required multiple surgical intervention/ operated to cover the wound gap and disfigurement leading to multiple exposure to general anaesthesia. Only one patient was required to be intubated and mechanically ventilated before taken for definitive surgical repair. Conclusion: In our case series, there was no mortality. The main challenges to anaesthesiologist were Emergency Airway Management, Blood and Fluid Resuscitation either at casualty or in the operation theatre.","PeriodicalId":13909,"journal":{"name":"International journal of biomedical research","volume":"11 1","pages":"694-698"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of biomedical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJBR.V8I12.4530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and Aims: Patients injured in bear attack present with different patterns of injuries. A common protocol may not be suitable for the management of injuries inflicted by these large wild animals. Anaesthetic management of such injuries often need multidisciplinary approach. Here, we reported case series of anaesthesia challenges in Bear bite patients who were brought to Govt. Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur; and were managed in emergency situations for surgery under anaesthesia. Method: This retrospective observational study was conducted on total 10 cases of either sex, having age ranging from 30-50 years, over a period of two years. The data was collected from case records and analyzed accordingly. Results: Due to injury over face and oedema, there was problem of ventilation with Ambu Bag as far as casualty management was concerned. It was difficult to hold the anaesthesia circuit mask while preoxygenation before induction and intubation. Also we faced difficulty in laryngoscopy and Intubation due to distorted anatomy of face and oedema. In few cases, Bear bite injury was noted on limb, chest and abdomen. Some of patients were required multiple surgical intervention/ operated to cover the wound gap and disfigurement leading to multiple exposure to general anaesthesia. Only one patient was required to be intubated and mechanically ventilated before taken for definitive surgical repair. Conclusion: In our case series, there was no mortality. The main challenges to anaesthesiologist were Emergency Airway Management, Blood and Fluid Resuscitation either at casualty or in the operation theatre.
熊咬伤患者的麻醉挑战
背景与目的:熊袭击中受伤的患者表现出不同的损伤模式。对于这些大型野生动物造成的伤害的处理,一个共同的协议可能并不合适。此类损伤的麻醉治疗往往需要多学科联合治疗。在这里,我们报告了被带到那格浦尔政府医学院和医院的熊咬伤患者麻醉挑战的病例系列;在紧急情况下进行麻醉手术。方法:回顾性观察研究共10例,男女均可,年龄30-50岁,为期两年。从病例记录中收集数据并进行相应分析。结果:由于面部损伤和水肿,在伤情处理中存在Ambu Bag通气问题。在诱导插管前预充氧时,麻醉回路面罩难以握住。由于面部解剖畸形和水肿,我们面临喉镜检查和插管的困难。少数病例出现四肢、胸部和腹部的熊咬伤。一些患者需要多次手术干预/手术来覆盖伤口间隙和毁容,导致多次全身麻醉。只有一名患者在接受最终手术修复前需要插管和机械通气。结论:在我们的病例系列中,没有死亡。麻醉医师面临的主要挑战是急诊气道管理,无论是在急诊室还是在手术室的血液和液体复苏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信