Odontogenic sinusitis: A state‐of‐the‐art review

Q2 Medicine
J. Craig
{"title":"Odontogenic sinusitis: A state‐of‐the‐art review","authors":"J. Craig","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) is more common than historically reported, and is underrepresented in the sinusitis literature. ODS is distinct from rhinosinusitis in that it is infectious sinusitis from an infectious dental source or a complication from dental procedures, and most commonly presents unilaterally. ODS clinical features, microbiology, and diagnostic and treatment paradigms are also distinct from rhinosinusitis. ODS evaluation and management should generally be conducted by both otolaryngologists and dental providers, and clinicians must be able to suspect and confirm the condition. ODS suspicion is driven by certain clinical features like unilateral maxillary sinus opacification on computed tomography, overt maxillary dental pathology on computed tomography, unilateral middle meatal purulence on nasal endoscopy, foul smell, and odontogenic bacteria in sinus cultures. Otolaryngologists should confirm the sinusitis through nasal endoscopy by assessing for middle meatal purulence, edema, or polyps. Dental providers should confirm dental pathology through appropriate examinations and imaging. Once ODS is confirmed, a multidisciplinary shared decision‐making process should ensue to discuss risks and benefits of the timing and different types of dental and sinus surgical interventions. Oral antibiotics are generally ineffective at resolving ODS, especially when there is treatable dental pathology. When both the dental pathology and sinusitis are addressed, resolution can be expected in 90%–100% of cases. For treatable dental pathology, while primary dental treatment may resolve the sinusitis, a significant percentage of patients still require endoscopic sinus surgery. For patients with significant sinusitis symptom burdens, primary endoscopic sinus surgery is an option to resolve symptoms faster, followed by appropriate dental management. More well‐designed studies are necessary across all areas of ODS.","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"8 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) is more common than historically reported, and is underrepresented in the sinusitis literature. ODS is distinct from rhinosinusitis in that it is infectious sinusitis from an infectious dental source or a complication from dental procedures, and most commonly presents unilaterally. ODS clinical features, microbiology, and diagnostic and treatment paradigms are also distinct from rhinosinusitis. ODS evaluation and management should generally be conducted by both otolaryngologists and dental providers, and clinicians must be able to suspect and confirm the condition. ODS suspicion is driven by certain clinical features like unilateral maxillary sinus opacification on computed tomography, overt maxillary dental pathology on computed tomography, unilateral middle meatal purulence on nasal endoscopy, foul smell, and odontogenic bacteria in sinus cultures. Otolaryngologists should confirm the sinusitis through nasal endoscopy by assessing for middle meatal purulence, edema, or polyps. Dental providers should confirm dental pathology through appropriate examinations and imaging. Once ODS is confirmed, a multidisciplinary shared decision‐making process should ensue to discuss risks and benefits of the timing and different types of dental and sinus surgical interventions. Oral antibiotics are generally ineffective at resolving ODS, especially when there is treatable dental pathology. When both the dental pathology and sinusitis are addressed, resolution can be expected in 90%–100% of cases. For treatable dental pathology, while primary dental treatment may resolve the sinusitis, a significant percentage of patients still require endoscopic sinus surgery. For patients with significant sinusitis symptom burdens, primary endoscopic sinus surgery is an option to resolve symptoms faster, followed by appropriate dental management. More well‐designed studies are necessary across all areas of ODS.
牙源性鼻窦炎:最新进展综述
牙源性鼻窦炎(ODS)比以往报道的更为常见,在鼻窦炎文献中代表性不足。ODS不同于鼻鼻窦炎,因为它是感染性鼻窦炎,来自感染性牙齿源或牙科手术并发症,最常见的是单侧表现。ODS的临床特征、微生物学、诊断和治疗模式也不同于鼻窦炎。ODS的评估和管理通常应由耳鼻喉科医生和牙科医生共同进行,临床医生必须能够怀疑和确认这种情况。某些临床特征,如计算机断层扫描显示单侧上颌窦混浊,计算机断层扫描显示明显的上颌牙病变,鼻内窥镜检查显示单侧中牙脓毒,气味难闻,鼻窦培养中有牙源性细菌,这些都是引起ODS怀疑的原因。耳鼻喉科医生应通过鼻内窥镜检查鼻窦脓肿、水肿或息肉来确认鼻窦炎。牙科医生应通过适当的检查和成像来确认牙齿病理。一旦ODS被确认,多学科的共同决策过程应该随之而来,讨论时间和不同类型的牙科和鼻窦手术干预的风险和益处。口服抗生素通常对解决ODS无效,特别是当有可治疗的牙齿病理时。当口腔病理和鼻窦炎都得到解决时,可以预期90%-100%的病例得到解决。对于可治疗的牙齿病理,虽然初级牙科治疗可以解决鼻窦炎,但很大比例的患者仍然需要内窥镜鼻窦手术。对于有明显鼻窦炎症状负担的患者,初级内窥镜鼻窦手术是一种更快解决症状的选择,其次是适当的牙科治疗。需要在消耗臭氧层物质的所有领域进行更多精心设计的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信