Writing Ability with Metaphorming Approach: A Systematic Review

Yati Suwartini, N. Lustyantie, Muchlas Suseno, Y. Supriyati
{"title":"Writing Ability with Metaphorming Approach: A Systematic Review","authors":"Yati Suwartini, N. Lustyantie, Muchlas Suseno, Y. Supriyati","doi":"10.17509/ije.v14i2.43885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metaphorming is a new way of brainstorming that covers all aspects and complexity of students’ creative thinking skills. This approach enhances fast-thinking ability and creativity, allowing them to connect something that is known with a new one for better problem-solving. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review on how to improve students’ writing skills through a metaphorming approach. The methodology used was the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Furthermore, the writing skills were examined using a metaphorming approach from 5 databases with several articles, including 143, 58, 4, 198, and 23 from Microsoft Academic, Scopus, JSTOR, crossref, and EBSCO, respectively. This study’s results analyzed 11 focus studies related to metaphorming effects. The study strategy was developed by formulating the problem, combining descriptors and keywords, and the year of publication. To choose the correct studies for review, three independent reviewers carried out abstract and full-text selection and research analysis. In this regard, 426 articles were obtained, though only 43 were selected for review. The results showed that mapping the metaphorming approach could improve writing skills. Therefore, this study provides valuable information about the metaphorming approach for better writing skills and can also be used to examine learning and teaching materials development. ","PeriodicalId":31806,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v14i2.43885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metaphorming is a new way of brainstorming that covers all aspects and complexity of students’ creative thinking skills. This approach enhances fast-thinking ability and creativity, allowing them to connect something that is known with a new one for better problem-solving. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review on how to improve students’ writing skills through a metaphorming approach. The methodology used was the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Furthermore, the writing skills were examined using a metaphorming approach from 5 databases with several articles, including 143, 58, 4, 198, and 23 from Microsoft Academic, Scopus, JSTOR, crossref, and EBSCO, respectively. This study’s results analyzed 11 focus studies related to metaphorming effects. The study strategy was developed by formulating the problem, combining descriptors and keywords, and the year of publication. To choose the correct studies for review, three independent reviewers carried out abstract and full-text selection and research analysis. In this regard, 426 articles were obtained, though only 43 were selected for review. The results showed that mapping the metaphorming approach could improve writing skills. Therefore, this study provides valuable information about the metaphorming approach for better writing skills and can also be used to examine learning and teaching materials development. 
运用隐喻方法的写作能力:系统回顾
隐喻是一种新的头脑风暴方式,它涵盖了学生创造性思维技能的方方面面和复杂性。这种方法提高了快速思考的能力和创造力,使他们能够将已知的事物与新的事物联系起来,从而更好地解决问题。本研究的目的是对如何通过隐喻方法提高学生的写作技巧进行系统的回顾。使用的方法是系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)。此外,采用隐喻法对来自Microsoft Academic、Scopus、JSTOR、crossref和EBSCO 5个数据库的143篇、58篇、4篇、198篇和23篇论文进行了写作技巧测试。本研究的结果分析了11项与隐喻效应相关的焦点研究。研究策略是通过阐述问题、结合描述符和关键词以及出版年份来制定的。为了选择正确的研究进行综述,三位独立的审稿人进行了摘要和全文的选择和研究分析。在这方面,获得了426篇文章,但只有43篇被选中进行审查。结果表明,映射隐喻方法可以提高写作技能。因此,本研究为提高写作技巧提供了有价值的信息,也可用于检查学习和教学材料的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书