Proactive interference of seventh grade students in solving problems of the greatest common divisor

Anita Lestari, E. Hidayanto, Sukoriyanto
{"title":"Proactive interference of seventh grade students in solving problems of the greatest common divisor","authors":"Anita Lestari, E. Hidayanto, Sukoriyanto","doi":"10.1063/5.0043382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem-solving is a critical element in learning mathematics. The way students solve problems can be identified using the Polya problem-solving process. Nonetheless, some students still experience barriers in solving problems of the Least Common Multiple and Greatest Common Divisor simultaneously. The Least Common Multiple and Greatest Common Divisor problems are distinct from one to another, but those have a similar solving procedure, i.g., determining prime factorization. Students were confused due to the similar steps in solving the Least Common Multiple and Greatest Common Divisor problems. This study aims to describe students’ thinking interference in solving the issue of the Greatest Common Divisor. This research was conducted by analyzing the work of seventh-grade students of Islamic Integrated Junior High School Al Fahmi Palu in solving Greatest Common Divisor problems. Furthermore, to obtain the supplementary data, an interview was conducted to a student who experiences proactive interference in solving the Greatest Common Divisor problem. The results of this study indicate that proactive interference occurred when students were solving the Greatest Common Divisor problem using the Least Common Multiple strategies. This study suggests that further researchers can examine other subjects with retroactive interference and conduct future studies on learning models to reduce the occurrence of proactive and retroactive interference.","PeriodicalId":68687,"journal":{"name":"新时代马克思主义论丛","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"新时代马克思主义论丛","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem-solving is a critical element in learning mathematics. The way students solve problems can be identified using the Polya problem-solving process. Nonetheless, some students still experience barriers in solving problems of the Least Common Multiple and Greatest Common Divisor simultaneously. The Least Common Multiple and Greatest Common Divisor problems are distinct from one to another, but those have a similar solving procedure, i.g., determining prime factorization. Students were confused due to the similar steps in solving the Least Common Multiple and Greatest Common Divisor problems. This study aims to describe students’ thinking interference in solving the issue of the Greatest Common Divisor. This research was conducted by analyzing the work of seventh-grade students of Islamic Integrated Junior High School Al Fahmi Palu in solving Greatest Common Divisor problems. Furthermore, to obtain the supplementary data, an interview was conducted to a student who experiences proactive interference in solving the Greatest Common Divisor problem. The results of this study indicate that proactive interference occurred when students were solving the Greatest Common Divisor problem using the Least Common Multiple strategies. This study suggests that further researchers can examine other subjects with retroactive interference and conduct future studies on learning models to reduce the occurrence of proactive and retroactive interference.
七年级学生在解决最大公约数问题中的主动干预
解决问题是学习数学的一个关键因素。学生解决问题的方式可以通过Polya解决问题的过程来识别。然而,一些学生在同时解决最小公倍数和最大公约数问题时仍然遇到障碍。最小公倍数和最大公因数问题彼此不同,但它们具有相似的求解过程,即确定质因数分解。学生们很困惑,因为解决最小公倍数和最大公约数问题的步骤相似。本研究旨在描述学生在解决最大公约数问题时的思维干扰。本研究通过分析伊斯兰综合初中Al Fahmi Palu七年级学生解决最大公约数问题的作业进行。此外,为了获得补充数据,对一名在解决最大公约数问题时遇到主动干扰的学生进行了访谈。本研究结果显示,学生在使用最小公倍数策略解决最大公约数问题时,会产生主动干扰。本研究建议进一步的研究者可以对其他具有回溯性干扰的被试进行研究,并对学习模式进行进一步的研究,以减少主动和回溯性干扰的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信