Comment – Income segregation in cities: A reflection on the gap between concept and measurement

Q3 Social Sciences
A. Moreno-Monroy
{"title":"Comment – Income segregation in cities: A reflection on the gap between concept and measurement","authors":"A. Moreno-Monroy","doi":"10.24187/ecostat.2017.497d.1932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[eng] In his study of twelve French metropolises, Jean-Michel Floch argues that the level of segregation, defined as the spatial separation of groups with different living standards within cities, is higher, in the city‑centres as well as the suburbs than in the outer-suburbs. It is also more marked in the higher living standards. This commentary argues that income segregation in French cities is low for international standards. Based on issues around the measurement . and comparability of income segregation indices, it elaborates on three issues. The first is that, contrary to popular belief, the segregation of poverty contributes little to overall city segregation, while the segregation of affluence as a large contributor remains under-debated. The second is that an empirical or normative benchmark for segregation is needed to frame the discussion around “ too much” segregation. The third is that the actual degree of physical disconnection between income groups, and between income groups and city amenities and services, is not truly measured by current income segregation measures, limiting the usefulness of such measures for policy designs.","PeriodicalId":38830,"journal":{"name":"Economie et Statistique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economie et Statistique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24187/ecostat.2017.497d.1932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

[eng] In his study of twelve French metropolises, Jean-Michel Floch argues that the level of segregation, defined as the spatial separation of groups with different living standards within cities, is higher, in the city‑centres as well as the suburbs than in the outer-suburbs. It is also more marked in the higher living standards. This commentary argues that income segregation in French cities is low for international standards. Based on issues around the measurement . and comparability of income segregation indices, it elaborates on three issues. The first is that, contrary to popular belief, the segregation of poverty contributes little to overall city segregation, while the segregation of affluence as a large contributor remains under-debated. The second is that an empirical or normative benchmark for segregation is needed to frame the discussion around “ too much” segregation. The third is that the actual degree of physical disconnection between income groups, and between income groups and city amenities and services, is not truly measured by current income segregation measures, limiting the usefulness of such measures for policy designs.
评论-城市收入隔离:对概念与测量差距的反思
Jean-Michel Floch在对12个法国大都市的研究中指出,城市中心和郊区的隔离程度(即城市内生活水平不同的群体之间的空间隔离)高于远郊。生活水平的提高也更加明显。这篇评论认为,按照国际标准,法国城市的收入隔离程度较低。基于围绕度量的问题。收入分异指标的可比性,从三个方面进行了阐述。首先,与普遍的看法相反,贫穷的隔离对整个城市的隔离贡献很小,而富裕的隔离作为一个很大的贡献者仍然没有得到讨论。其次,需要一个经验或规范的隔离基准来构建围绕“过多”隔离的讨论。第三,收入群体之间以及收入群体与城市便利设施和服务之间的实际脱节程度,并没有真正用目前的收入隔离措施来衡量,从而限制了这些措施对政策设计的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economie et Statistique
Economie et Statistique Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信