Why Get Your Engineering Programme Accredited?

P. Goodhew
{"title":"Why Get Your Engineering Programme Accredited?","authors":"P. Goodhew","doi":"10.4018/ijqaete.2012040109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many countries engineering degree programmes can be submitted for\naccreditation by a professional body and/or graduate engineers can be certified\nor registered. Where this is available most academic institutions feel that\nthey must offer accredited engineering programmes. I suggest that these\nprocesses are at best ineffective (they do not achieve their aims) and at worst\nthey are destructive of creativity, innovation and confidence in the academic\ncommunity. I wish to argue that such processes (including any internal\ncertification within CDIO) should be abandoned completely. I will propose\nalternative ways of maintaining the quality of engineering design and\nmanufacture, which place the responsibility where it properly lies – with the\nmanufacturer or contractor.","PeriodicalId":13684,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Qual. Assur. Eng. Technol. Educ.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Qual. Assur. Eng. Technol. Educ.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijqaete.2012040109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In many countries engineering degree programmes can be submitted for accreditation by a professional body and/or graduate engineers can be certified or registered. Where this is available most academic institutions feel that they must offer accredited engineering programmes. I suggest that these processes are at best ineffective (they do not achieve their aims) and at worst they are destructive of creativity, innovation and confidence in the academic community. I wish to argue that such processes (including any internal certification within CDIO) should be abandoned completely. I will propose alternative ways of maintaining the quality of engineering design and manufacture, which place the responsibility where it properly lies – with the manufacturer or contractor.
为什么要让你的工程课程获得认证?
在许多国家,工程学位课程可以由专业机构提交认证,并且/或研究生工程师可以获得认证或注册。在这种情况下,大多数学术机构认为他们必须提供经过认证的工程课程。我认为这些过程充其量是无效的(他们没有达到他们的目标),最坏的情况是他们破坏了学术界的创造力、创新和信心。我想说的是,这样的过程(包括CDIO内部的任何认证)应该完全放弃。我将提出保持工程设计和制造质量的替代方法,将责任放在适当的地方-制造商或承包商。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信