Evaluating Research Self-Efficacy in Undergraduate Students: Experience Matters

Heather M. Manitzas Hill, Jennifer Zwahr, Antonio Gonzalez, III
{"title":"Evaluating Research Self-Efficacy in Undergraduate Students: Experience Matters","authors":"Heather M. Manitzas Hill, Jennifer Zwahr, Antonio Gonzalez, III","doi":"10.14434/josotl.v22i1.31203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beliefs about conducting research and completing major projects, such as master’s theses and dissertations, suggest that previous experience, guidance from a mentor, and cohesive teams are particularly important in boosting the confidence to conduct research in graduate students (research self-efficacy).  Although these factors are also thought to be important for undergraduate students, much less is known about undergraduate interest in research and beliefs about conducting research.  The purpose of the current study was to investigate the research self-efficacy of undergraduate students attending a minority- and first-generation-serving liberal arts institution. Over 500 undergraduate students attending a small private university in south Texas completed surveys regarding their interest in conducting research, research self-efficacy, and various research experiences. Seventy-one percent were female, 37% were freshman,  and 58% majored in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Fifty-four present had never had a research experience other than completing a survey, whereas 17% had completed two or more research experiences. Greater interest in research was associated with higher levels of research self-efficacy. Students reporting research experiences were confident in their abilities to conduct research overall. Students with two or more experiences reported significantly higher levels of interest in research and research self-efficacy than students who had less or no experience. Qualitative analyses elucidated reasons for the observed differences. The results reinforce the need to expose undergraduate students to research across classes and disciplines and suggest participation in research pools can develop interest and beliefs about research.","PeriodicalId":93822,"journal":{"name":"The journal of scholarship of teaching and learning : JoSoTL","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of scholarship of teaching and learning : JoSoTL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v22i1.31203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Beliefs about conducting research and completing major projects, such as master’s theses and dissertations, suggest that previous experience, guidance from a mentor, and cohesive teams are particularly important in boosting the confidence to conduct research in graduate students (research self-efficacy).  Although these factors are also thought to be important for undergraduate students, much less is known about undergraduate interest in research and beliefs about conducting research.  The purpose of the current study was to investigate the research self-efficacy of undergraduate students attending a minority- and first-generation-serving liberal arts institution. Over 500 undergraduate students attending a small private university in south Texas completed surveys regarding their interest in conducting research, research self-efficacy, and various research experiences. Seventy-one percent were female, 37% were freshman,  and 58% majored in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Fifty-four present had never had a research experience other than completing a survey, whereas 17% had completed two or more research experiences. Greater interest in research was associated with higher levels of research self-efficacy. Students reporting research experiences were confident in their abilities to conduct research overall. Students with two or more experiences reported significantly higher levels of interest in research and research self-efficacy than students who had less or no experience. Qualitative analyses elucidated reasons for the observed differences. The results reinforce the need to expose undergraduate students to research across classes and disciplines and suggest participation in research pools can develop interest and beliefs about research.
大学生研究自我效能的评估:经验的影响
关于进行研究和完成重大项目(如硕士论文和学位论文)的信念表明,以前的经验、导师的指导和有凝聚力的团队对于增强研究生进行研究的信心(研究自我效能感)尤为重要。虽然这些因素也被认为对本科生很重要,但对本科生对研究的兴趣和对进行研究的信念知之甚少。摘要本研究旨在探讨少数族裔及第一代文理院校本科生的研究自我效能感。德克萨斯州南部一所小型私立大学的500多名本科生完成了关于他们进行研究的兴趣、研究自我效能和各种研究经历的调查。其中71%是女性,37%是大一新生,58%主修人文社会科学。54名受访者除了完成一项调查外,从未有过研究经历,而17%的受访者完成了两次或两次以上的研究经历。对研究的兴趣越大,研究自我效能就越高。报告研究经历的学生对自己进行研究的总体能力充满信心。有两次或两次以上经验的学生对研究的兴趣和研究自我效能的水平明显高于没有经验或经验较少的学生。定性分析阐明了观察到的差异的原因。研究结果强调了让本科生接触跨班级和跨学科研究的必要性,并表明参与研究团队可以培养对研究的兴趣和信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信