Special Issue on “Financing, Regulation and Performance of the European Rail Sector”

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
G. Götz, J. Schäfer
{"title":"Special Issue on “Financing, Regulation and Performance of the European Rail Sector”","authors":"G. Götz, J. Schäfer","doi":"10.1515/rne-2018-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rail transport does not seem to live up to its potential in terms of the contributions it could make to satisfy the transport and mobility needs in the EU and in other economies; this concerns in particular the significant contribution it could make to the decarbonization of transport.1 The latter holds despite substantial government funding of the railway sector. In May 2017, a workshop on “Financing, Regulation and Performance of the European Rail Sector” brought together academics and stakeholders at Justus Liebig University Giessen to discuss these topics from various angles. This special issue presents selected contributions from the workshop to provide both academia and practitioners from the sector with a state of the art overview of railway funding and financing as well as on selected policy debates and recent regulatory changes ranging from the setting of access charges to the optimal (vertical) structure of the sector. Chris Nash surveys “Railway Finance in Europe” and provides both a general overview of the possible justifications for subsidies to the rail sector and an evaluation of how these subsidies are given in practice as well as how efficient use of these subsidies could be ensured. Jan Schäfer and Georg Götz complement this survey with the presentation of a detailed database on the public funding structure in eight European countries. They highlight that some countries like Germany and France mainly fund the provision of (regional) passenger train services via Public Service Obligations, which to a large degree cover high track access charges, while other countries like the UK directly finance the operation of the infrastructure. Lorenzo Casullo focuses his discussion of the funding","PeriodicalId":45659,"journal":{"name":"Review of Network Economics","volume":"90 1","pages":"63 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Network Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rne-2018-0023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rail transport does not seem to live up to its potential in terms of the contributions it could make to satisfy the transport and mobility needs in the EU and in other economies; this concerns in particular the significant contribution it could make to the decarbonization of transport.1 The latter holds despite substantial government funding of the railway sector. In May 2017, a workshop on “Financing, Regulation and Performance of the European Rail Sector” brought together academics and stakeholders at Justus Liebig University Giessen to discuss these topics from various angles. This special issue presents selected contributions from the workshop to provide both academia and practitioners from the sector with a state of the art overview of railway funding and financing as well as on selected policy debates and recent regulatory changes ranging from the setting of access charges to the optimal (vertical) structure of the sector. Chris Nash surveys “Railway Finance in Europe” and provides both a general overview of the possible justifications for subsidies to the rail sector and an evaluation of how these subsidies are given in practice as well as how efficient use of these subsidies could be ensured. Jan Schäfer and Georg Götz complement this survey with the presentation of a detailed database on the public funding structure in eight European countries. They highlight that some countries like Germany and France mainly fund the provision of (regional) passenger train services via Public Service Obligations, which to a large degree cover high track access charges, while other countries like the UK directly finance the operation of the infrastructure. Lorenzo Casullo focuses his discussion of the funding
“欧洲铁路部门的融资、监管和绩效”特刊
铁路运输在满足欧盟和其他经济体的运输和移动需求方面的贡献似乎没有发挥其潜力;这尤其涉及它可能对运输脱碳作出的重大贡献尽管政府为铁路部门提供了大量资金,但后者仍然存在。2017年5月,关于“欧洲铁路部门的融资,监管和绩效”的研讨会汇集了学者和利益相关者,从各个角度讨论这些主题。本期特刊精选了研讨会的部分成果,为学术界和行业从业者提供了铁路融资的最新概况,以及精选的政策辩论和最近的监管变化,范围从准入收费的设定到行业的最佳(垂直)结构。Chris Nash调查了“欧洲的铁路财政”,提供了对铁路部门补贴的可能理由的总体概述,并评估了这些补贴在实践中是如何给予的,以及如何确保这些补贴的有效使用。Jan Schäfer和Georg Götz提供了关于八个欧洲国家公共资金结构的详细数据库,从而补充了这项调查。他们强调,一些国家,如德国和法国,主要通过公共服务义务为(地区)客运列车服务提供资金,这在很大程度上覆盖了高轨道使用费,而其他国家,如英国,直接为基础设施的运营提供资金。Lorenzo Casullo将他的讨论集中在资金上
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Review of Network Economics seeks to help policy makers, academics, and practitioners keep informed of new research and policy debate in network economics and related subjects that are relevant to the study of network industries. By publishing high quality research on topical issues relevant to network industries, it is hoped readers will be able to gain a deeper understanding of the economic issues involved and that this will improve the quality of decision making by private and public organisations, and debate among researchers. The articles can cover specific network industries, or may deal with general issues that have relevance to a number of different network industries, including topics in the economics of networks, regulation, competition law, or industrial organisation. Papers that provide insights into policy debates are especially welcome, as are up-to-date surveys, book reviews, and comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信