Aconite – a Poison, or a Medicine? Ancient and Early Byzantine Testimonies

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Krzysztof Jagusiak, Konrad Tadajczyk
{"title":"Aconite – a Poison, or a Medicine? Ancient and Early Byzantine Testimonies","authors":"Krzysztof Jagusiak, Konrad Tadajczyk","doi":"10.18778/2084-140x.12.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aconite (Aconitum napellus) was one of the most notorious, poisonous plants in the ancient world. Its dangerous, lethal power – present in leaves, roots, stem, and tuber – was well known to the Greeks and the Romans from the earliest times. Evidence of this phenomenon is not only present in archaeological findings, but also in many writings – biographies, poems, legal codes, etc.\nHowever, the most precise and detailed accounts come from treatises written by botanists, physicians and encyclopaedists, like Theophrastus, Nicander, Pliny the Elder, Dioscorides, or Galen, and by early Byzantine authors, Oribasius, Aetius of Amida, and Paul of Aegina. In their testimonies, one can find descriptions of aconite, its influence on the human body (and animals), and remedies for affected people.\nIn contrast, there are few passages from these sources that inform the readers about the healing properties of aconite. According to these fragments, carefully administered, aconite could be helpful in some therapies, but its use was extremely hazardous, as even a small part of the plant could kill a man.","PeriodicalId":41598,"journal":{"name":"SEARCH-Journal of the Southeast Asia Research Centre for Communications and Humanities","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEARCH-Journal of the Southeast Asia Research Centre for Communications and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140x.12.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aconite (Aconitum napellus) was one of the most notorious, poisonous plants in the ancient world. Its dangerous, lethal power – present in leaves, roots, stem, and tuber – was well known to the Greeks and the Romans from the earliest times. Evidence of this phenomenon is not only present in archaeological findings, but also in many writings – biographies, poems, legal codes, etc. However, the most precise and detailed accounts come from treatises written by botanists, physicians and encyclopaedists, like Theophrastus, Nicander, Pliny the Elder, Dioscorides, or Galen, and by early Byzantine authors, Oribasius, Aetius of Amida, and Paul of Aegina. In their testimonies, one can find descriptions of aconite, its influence on the human body (and animals), and remedies for affected people. In contrast, there are few passages from these sources that inform the readers about the healing properties of aconite. According to these fragments, carefully administered, aconite could be helpful in some therapies, but its use was extremely hazardous, as even a small part of the plant could kill a man.
乌头是毒药还是良药?古代和早期拜占庭的证言
乌头(Aconitum napellus)是古代世界最臭名昭著的有毒植物之一。它的危险、致命的力量——存在于叶子、根、茎和块茎中——从最早的时候起就为希腊人和罗马人所熟知。这种现象的证据不仅存在于考古发现中,也存在于许多著作中——传记、诗歌、法典等。然而,最精确和详细的描述来自植物学家、医生和百科全书编纂者的论文,如泰奥弗拉斯图斯、尼坎德、老普林尼、迪奥斯科里德或盖伦,以及早期拜占庭作家奥里巴修斯、阿米达的埃提乌斯和埃伊纳的保罗。在他们的证词中,人们可以找到对乌头的描述,它对人体(和动物)的影响,以及对受影响的人的治疗方法。相比之下,从这些来源中很少有段落告诉读者关于乌头的治疗特性。根据这些碎片,仔细使用,乌头在某些治疗中可能有帮助,但它的使用是极其危险的,因为即使是一小部分乌头也可能致命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信