HOTSPOT ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON BETWEEN SATELLITE-DERIVED AEROSOL OPTICAL DEPTH AND GROUND-BASED PARTICULATE MATTER MEASUREMENTS IN METRO MANILA

Q2 Environmental Science
B. A. B. Recto, R. Torres, R. Ramos, A. Tamondong, M. Cayetano, B. J. D. Jiao
{"title":"HOTSPOT ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON BETWEEN SATELLITE-DERIVED AEROSOL OPTICAL DEPTH AND GROUND-BASED PARTICULATE MATTER MEASUREMENTS IN METRO MANILA","authors":"B. A. B. Recto, R. Torres, R. Ramos, A. Tamondong, M. Cayetano, B. J. D. Jiao","doi":"10.5194/isprs-annals-x-4-w1-2022-639-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Highly urbanized regions such as the Metro Manila area in the Philippines contribute to the deterioration of air quality through overpopulation, excessive vehicle emissions, and industrialization. However, the limited number of ground monitoring stations hinders the detailed estimation of the region’s overall air quality. Satellite-derived air pollutant concentrations have been used in several research studies as a substitute or supplementary to ground-based data due to their extensive spatial and temporal coverage. Using the aerosol optical depth (AOD) from the MODIS Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC) algorithm and ground measurements of coarse particulate matter (PM10), this study explores the comparison between satellite-derived and ground-based air pollutant concentrations measured from 2017 to 2020 through trend analysis of monthly average values per city. With 16 stations located in different cities, the monthly average values of AOD vs PM10 showed inconsistent results due to significant gaps in the ground data. Through optimized hotspot analysis, it was found that 7.24% of the Metro Manila region are considered hotspots using the MAIAC AOD values from 2017 to 2019 (pre-pandemic). From 2018 to 2020 (pandemic), 23.86% of Metro Manila are counted as hotspots. The AOD derived from satellite imagery and hotspot analysis can be used for future studies that focus on the development of models to predict ground pollutant values and the designation of non-attainment areas.\n","PeriodicalId":30633,"journal":{"name":"ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-x-4-w1-2022-639-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Highly urbanized regions such as the Metro Manila area in the Philippines contribute to the deterioration of air quality through overpopulation, excessive vehicle emissions, and industrialization. However, the limited number of ground monitoring stations hinders the detailed estimation of the region’s overall air quality. Satellite-derived air pollutant concentrations have been used in several research studies as a substitute or supplementary to ground-based data due to their extensive spatial and temporal coverage. Using the aerosol optical depth (AOD) from the MODIS Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC) algorithm and ground measurements of coarse particulate matter (PM10), this study explores the comparison between satellite-derived and ground-based air pollutant concentrations measured from 2017 to 2020 through trend analysis of monthly average values per city. With 16 stations located in different cities, the monthly average values of AOD vs PM10 showed inconsistent results due to significant gaps in the ground data. Through optimized hotspot analysis, it was found that 7.24% of the Metro Manila region are considered hotspots using the MAIAC AOD values from 2017 to 2019 (pre-pandemic). From 2018 to 2020 (pandemic), 23.86% of Metro Manila are counted as hotspots. The AOD derived from satellite imagery and hotspot analysis can be used for future studies that focus on the development of models to predict ground pollutant values and the designation of non-attainment areas.
马尼拉大都会地区卫星气溶胶光学深度与地面颗粒物测量的热点分析与比较
摘要高度城市化的地区,如菲律宾的马尼拉大都会地区,由于人口过多、车辆排放过多和工业化,导致空气质量恶化。然而,地面监测站数量有限,妨碍了对该地区整体空气质量的详细估计。若干研究使用卫星获得的空气污染物浓度作为地面数据的替代或补充,因为它们具有广泛的空间和时间覆盖范围。本研究利用MODIS多角度大气校正(MAIAC)算法的气溶胶光学深度(AOD)和地面粗颗粒物(PM10)测量数据,通过对每个城市月平均值的趋势分析,探讨了2017 - 2020年卫星衍生和地面测量的空气污染物浓度的比较。16个站点分布在不同的城市,AOD和PM10的月平均值由于地面数据存在较大差距,结果不一致。通过优化热点分析发现,2017 - 2019年(大流行前),马尼拉大都会地区有7.24%的地区被认为是热点地区。从2018年到2020年(大流行),马尼拉大都会23.86%的地区被列为热点地区。通过卫星图像和热点分析得到的AOD可用于未来的研究,重点是开发模型来预测地面污染物值和指定未达标区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书