Virtual reality simulation in training endoscopic skills: A systematic review

Q3 Medicine
Wenlan Zhang , Xin Liu , Bin Zheng
{"title":"Virtual reality simulation in training endoscopic skills: A systematic review","authors":"Wenlan Zhang ,&nbsp;Xin Liu ,&nbsp;Bin Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2021.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Training young physicians in gastrointestinal endoscopy through virtual reality (VR) simulators has become popular. It is important to evaluate the benefits and usefulness of this technology for teaching endoscopic skills. The objective of this literature review is to understand the benefits of VR technology through quantitative and qualitative examination of learning outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A literature search of 7 databases was conducted. Studies which compared the effects of learning through VR simulation and another method of learning were included. In addition, studies were included if they evaluated learning outcomes on clinical patients. Participants could be medical residents, fellows, physicians, or nurses. Common outcomes measured across studies included subjective overall performance scores, total procedure times, rate of successful procedure completion, error rates, patient pain or discomfort, and measures of independence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 22 studies were included. Overall, VR simulation training was seen to be comparable or significantly better than clinical training, no training, other types of simulation, and another form of VR training. Many authors reported increasing patient safety, reducing stress and time constraints, and shortening the learning curve as advantages of VR simulation training. However, this form of training is also expensive and may result in the learning of bad habits.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>VR simulation technology can be a valuable form of educating endoscopy novices if properly supervised during training, and if there is also integration of clinical training.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900921000608/pdfft?md5=b5c6773761c7b59973d5de0a1b5cab99&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900921000608-main.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900921000608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objective

Training young physicians in gastrointestinal endoscopy through virtual reality (VR) simulators has become popular. It is important to evaluate the benefits and usefulness of this technology for teaching endoscopic skills. The objective of this literature review is to understand the benefits of VR technology through quantitative and qualitative examination of learning outcomes.

Methods

A literature search of 7 databases was conducted. Studies which compared the effects of learning through VR simulation and another method of learning were included. In addition, studies were included if they evaluated learning outcomes on clinical patients. Participants could be medical residents, fellows, physicians, or nurses. Common outcomes measured across studies included subjective overall performance scores, total procedure times, rate of successful procedure completion, error rates, patient pain or discomfort, and measures of independence.

Results

A total of 22 studies were included. Overall, VR simulation training was seen to be comparable or significantly better than clinical training, no training, other types of simulation, and another form of VR training. Many authors reported increasing patient safety, reducing stress and time constraints, and shortening the learning curve as advantages of VR simulation training. However, this form of training is also expensive and may result in the learning of bad habits.

Conclusion

VR simulation technology can be a valuable form of educating endoscopy novices if properly supervised during training, and if there is also integration of clinical training.

内窥镜技能训练中的虚拟现实模拟:系统综述
目的利用虚拟现实(VR)模拟器对年轻医师进行胃肠道内窥镜检查培训已成为一种流行趋势。评估这种技术在内镜技能教学中的益处和有用性是很重要的。本文献综述的目的是通过对学习成果的定量和定性检查来了解VR技术的好处。方法对7个数据库进行文献检索。研究比较了通过VR模拟学习和另一种学习方法的效果。此外,如果研究评估了临床患者的学习结果,则将其纳入研究。参与者可以是住院医师、研究员、医生或护士。研究中测量的常见结果包括主观总体表现评分、总手术时间、手术成功率、错误率、患者疼痛或不适以及独立性测量。结果共纳入22项研究。总体而言,虚拟现实模拟培训被认为与临床培训、无培训、其他类型的模拟和另一种形式的虚拟现实培训相当或显著优于临床培训。许多作者报告了VR模拟训练的优点,包括提高患者安全性、减少压力和时间限制、缩短学习曲线。然而,这种形式的训练也很昂贵,可能会导致坏习惯的学习。结论如果在培训过程中进行适当的指导,并与临床培训相结合,vr模拟技术可以成为一种有价值的内窥镜培训形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery minimally invasive surgery-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery aims to provide an academic exchange platform for minimally invasive surgery at an international level. We seek out and publish the excellent original articles, reviews and editorials as well as exciting new techniques to promote the academic development. Topics of interests include, but are not limited to: ▪ Minimally invasive clinical research mainly in General Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Urology, Neurosurgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Gastroenterology, Orthopedics, Colorectal Surgery, Otolaryngology, etc.; ▪ Basic research in minimally invasive surgery; ▪ Research of techniques and equipments in minimally invasive surgery, and application of laparoscopy, endoscopy, robot and medical imaging; ▪ Development of medical education in minimally invasive surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信