The College Access Debate: Class Considerations And College Preparation

Matthew R. Hodgman
{"title":"The College Access Debate: Class Considerations And College Preparation","authors":"Matthew R. Hodgman","doi":"10.19030/TLC.V10I1.7532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The college access debate in America remains an important one. Affirmative action policies and practices continue to occupy a significant sub-component of the overall college access discussion. Recent legal debates and policy changes pertaining to affirmative action have encouraged analysis surrounding the overall viability and fairness of these policies. This article describes the current parameters and arguments surrounding the college access debate in America in relation to affirmative action practices and makes suggestions as to how these practices can be improved. Three major aims of the article are to articulate the shortcomings of affirmative action practices in their current forms, to investigate the potential benefits of considering students’ social-class backgrounds when making affirmative action admissions decisions at institutions of higher education, and to ultimately point out that college access factors prior to and following the admissions process, such as college preparation and the degree of support mechanisms in place after matriculation, are potentially more important to the access debate than affirmative action considerations. This article concludes that all students can significantly benefit from exposure to higher education and that affirmative action policies should address social class in some capacity or be abandoned.","PeriodicalId":89968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of college teaching and learning","volume":"3 1","pages":"63-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of college teaching and learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19030/TLC.V10I1.7532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The college access debate in America remains an important one. Affirmative action policies and practices continue to occupy a significant sub-component of the overall college access discussion. Recent legal debates and policy changes pertaining to affirmative action have encouraged analysis surrounding the overall viability and fairness of these policies. This article describes the current parameters and arguments surrounding the college access debate in America in relation to affirmative action practices and makes suggestions as to how these practices can be improved. Three major aims of the article are to articulate the shortcomings of affirmative action practices in their current forms, to investigate the potential benefits of considering students’ social-class backgrounds when making affirmative action admissions decisions at institutions of higher education, and to ultimately point out that college access factors prior to and following the admissions process, such as college preparation and the degree of support mechanisms in place after matriculation, are potentially more important to the access debate than affirmative action considerations. This article concludes that all students can significantly benefit from exposure to higher education and that affirmative action policies should address social class in some capacity or be abandoned.
大学入学辩论:课堂考虑和大学准备
在美国,关于大学入学的辩论仍然很重要。平权行动政策和实践继续占据着整个大学入学讨论的重要组成部分。最近有关平权行动的法律辩论和政策变化促使人们围绕这些政策的总体可行性和公平性进行分析。本文描述了围绕美国大学入学辩论的当前参数和争论,并就如何改进这些做法提出了建议。本文的三个主要目的是阐明当前形式的平权行动实践的缺点,调查在高等教育机构做出平权行动录取决定时考虑学生的社会阶层背景的潜在好处,并最终指出在录取过程之前和之后的大学准入因素,例如大学准备和入学后的支持机制程度。在入学辩论中可能比平权法案更重要。这篇文章的结论是,所有学生都可以从接受高等教育中显著受益,平权行动政策应该在某种程度上解决社会阶级问题,否则就应该被放弃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书