Advocacy of The Ombudsman Institute for The Special Region of Yogyakarta in Completing The Complaints of Educational Problems in The Special Region of Yogyakarta

Titin Astuti
{"title":"Advocacy of The Ombudsman Institute for The Special Region of Yogyakarta in Completing The Complaints of Educational Problems in The Special Region of Yogyakarta","authors":"Titin Astuti","doi":"10.21831/sakp.v10i3.17459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to describe the Advocacy of the Ombudsman Institute for the Special Region of Yogyakarta in completing the complaints of education problems in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. This research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. Data validity uses triangulation of sources, techniques, and time. Data analysis techniques include data collection, data condensation, data presentation, and conclusion drawings. Research Results: (1) Complaint of Education Problems in DIY Ombudsman Institutions Mapped into a Regular Complaint (Governance of Education and School Management) and Temporary (PPDB), (2) Stages of Advocacy for DIY Ombudsman Institutions, namely the Stage of Preparation (Consultation and Clarification), Implementation Stage (Coordination, investigation, mediation), and stages of assessment (monitoring). Advocacy of DIY Ombudsman Institutions specifically for education, namely educational complaints posts. (3) Supporting factors, namely the existence of pic every education office, complete documents, cooperative attitudes, and monitoring. Inhibiting factors, namely the lack of human resources, community concerns over the impact of the report, the school's violation of the definition of donations and levies, the final product recommendations as input, and the wrong perception of the public.","PeriodicalId":21931,"journal":{"name":"Spektrum Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spektrum Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21831/sakp.v10i3.17459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to describe the Advocacy of the Ombudsman Institute for the Special Region of Yogyakarta in completing the complaints of education problems in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. This research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. Data validity uses triangulation of sources, techniques, and time. Data analysis techniques include data collection, data condensation, data presentation, and conclusion drawings. Research Results: (1) Complaint of Education Problems in DIY Ombudsman Institutions Mapped into a Regular Complaint (Governance of Education and School Management) and Temporary (PPDB), (2) Stages of Advocacy for DIY Ombudsman Institutions, namely the Stage of Preparation (Consultation and Clarification), Implementation Stage (Coordination, investigation, mediation), and stages of assessment (monitoring). Advocacy of DIY Ombudsman Institutions specifically for education, namely educational complaints posts. (3) Supporting factors, namely the existence of pic every education office, complete documents, cooperative attitudes, and monitoring. Inhibiting factors, namely the lack of human resources, community concerns over the impact of the report, the school's violation of the definition of donations and levies, the final product recommendations as input, and the wrong perception of the public.
倡导日惹特区申诉专员协会完成对日惹特区教育问题的投诉
本研究的目的是描述日惹特区申诉专员研究所在完成对日惹特区教育问题的申诉方面的宣传。本研究采用定性方法进行描述性研究。数据有效性使用来源、技术和时间的三角测量。数据分析技术包括数据收集、数据浓缩、数据表示和结论绘图。研究结果:(1)将DIY申诉机构的教育问题投诉映射为定期投诉(教育治理和学校管理)和临时投诉(PPDB); (2) DIY申诉机构的宣传阶段,即准备阶段(咨询和澄清)、实施阶段(协调、调查、调解)和评估阶段(监测)。倡导DIY教育申诉专员机构,即教育投诉岗位。(3)支持因素,即各教育办是否存在pic,文件齐全,合作态度,监督。制约因素,即人力资源的缺乏、社会对报告影响的担忧、学校违反捐赠和征税的定义、最终产品的建议作为输入、公众的错误认知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信